Do you agree or disagree technology has made children life less creative than in the past. support your answer with reasons and examples.

From a broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which technology become an integral part of everybody's life. It is not far-fetched to presume that creativity is represented as a significant indicator for successful people. I concur with the view that technology affects children and they are less creative than before. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following paragraph.
First and foremost, youngsters adversely affected by the emergence of technology. It create a situation in which children have access to diverse information and most of students spend too much time on surfing the internet in order to find the answer of their assignments. So there is nothing to forced them think about their problem. My own experiences demonstrates this concept. When I was a sophomore, I tried to solve my mathematics question by using the internet. Then, it made me really lazy and I had no creativity for my homework.
Moreover, the advent of technology creates many problems which can lead to mind disorder. when youngsters want to call each other, they tend to press their friend's name in cellphone. They do not incline to memorize their friend's number as they believe that it does not need to keep their number in mind. The less use your mind, the more hurt your mind.
Thirdly, presence the technology provides an opportunity which students entertain themselves. These days, there are various cellphone which contain a lot of application. Whenever young adults are in bad mood, they entertain themselves by game which is in the phone rather than create a game by themselves. Whereas, in the past, the absence of technology was very helpful and children had a lot of entertainment.
In conclusion, I really believe that creativity is reduced in children by the emergence of technology.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sful people. I concur with the view that technology affects children and they are...
^^
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
...cted by the emergence of technology. It create a situation in which children have acce...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 161, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the students') or simply say ''most students''.
Suggestion: most of the students; most students
... have access to diverse information and most of students spend too much time on surfing the inte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...oblems which can lead to mind disorder. when youngsters want to call each other, the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udents entertain themselves. These days, there are various cellphone which contai...
^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'cellphones'?
Suggestion: cellphones
...mselves. These days, there are various cellphone which contain a lot of application. Whe...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, really, so, then, third, thirdly, whereas, i feel, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01633986928 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90872621552 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581699346405 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.496665075 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7894736842 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1052631579 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198810183819 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532787632503 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649808780507 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10012863553 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466250272088 0.0645574589148 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.