No one cast a shadow on the fact that all of us should work in order to provide the good condition for ourselves. So choosing job play a vital role in people’s life. If people work three days a week for long hour, they will be satisfied more than those who work five days a week for shorter hours. I am in favor of the opinion that the less you work in week, the more you are satisfying. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following paragraph.
To begin with, being at work less than five days for long hours offers us a lot of great opportunity by which we can have a get together with our friends and families. What I mean is that by making time we have a perfect time with relatives and we can engage in discussion each other. My own experience demonstrates this concept. As a sophomore student who works just three days a week, not only do I make money but also I have enough time for spending with my friends.
Secondly, working less for longer hours create a situation by which we can get relax and refresh our mind. In other words, we can distance from work and problems by having more days off. Let me illustrates with one of my experiences. As I mentioned my job, since I want to gladden my mind and boost my happiness during the off day I read books and in this way I feel comfortable and relaxed.
In conclusion, being relax and having time are very crucial for me so I agree with the statement which mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...the less you work in week, the more you are satisfying. I feel this way for two main reasons w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, i feel, i mean, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1977.66487455 60% => OK
No of words: 279.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.26523297491 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42625062661 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566308243728 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 618.680645161 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4730515416 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415252039525 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132946833621 0.076458572812 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111978816014 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236038303279 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112461244662 0.0645574589148 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 58.1214874552 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.49 10.9000537634 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 86.8835125448 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.