Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well.
The definition and concept of success vary from person to person. Humans, by nature, always want more and more, and always in the needs. In this process, the bearing of a risky venture obtained a success the path. Unless there is no endeavor for risky business, people do not get success. I believe that to become a successful one has to face risky task than doing mundane things. I feel this way for several reasons, which I would explore in the following essays.
To begin with, one has to understand what are Innovators? They were the early adopters in the society. They are 2 percent of the total population in the world. Thus, why only limited people can get success in their life. These early adopters adopt the technology first in their community, and as a whole in the country. However, laggards do not try until some would get success, in other words, the things would become normal to all. This habit of an innovator or successful person makes a difference from them with a non-successful person. A person who has the habit of doing the things which were already performed by the others always remains at the same stage during their life span.
A successful person invests their efforts at a huge risk. They could not guarantee it until any results would be obtained. In our society, most of the successful persons are a businessman. For example, they spend a certain amount of money in a business. During the few initial years, they might be in loss. After a few and a few years, they keep on progressing. Finally, in the long run, they have a high profit. Nevertheless, another shopkeeper, who is in the shade of a successful person, starts to sell the commodity only when it was found to be highly demanded in the market. In economics there is a law "higher the risk, higher would be the returns".
The spending of some assets for a long time without speculation of results is a risky phenomenon. Many of our research trials are like this. This takes a number of years to get complete. And, moreover, it also might be the wastage of valuable time and money. However, when this process completes and gets the desired outputs persons could be a success or a real hero of our earth. For instance, many of our scientists and researchers have passed their whole life in delving. In the case of a person, who used to perform a trial, which is previously done by anonymous; for their name, there might not be a success. The new findings provided by scientists lead to be successful for them.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that people who have done risky and new activities in their life would make them successful as compared to others. This is because it leads to new findings which would be innocuous to human life and because a person can get a more amount of returns in the same period of time by others.
- "We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whoseviews contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning." 66
- For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 70
- The reading and lecture are about the impacts of speaking by the Professors on the television The reading says that it would have a several benifits to the large number of stakeholders when doing this and provides three reaons for support However the lect 73
- The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 70
- "In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn asmuch by watching television as they can by reading books." 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...et a more amount of returns in the same period of time by others.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2331.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 506.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60671936759 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58403196033 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47628458498 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4440802996 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.6363636364 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69696969697 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210140752916 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530102566349 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460656186894 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117401607153 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560943177779 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 11.7677419355 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.