It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
The world in this arena is covered by technology. Every people have varied choices in the wants of a technology. Youth might have some demand for one, while old might have others. However, among the different types of technology, the government has to gives more emphasis on access to the internet over the public transportation. The reasons behinds these issues would explore in the following essays.
To begin with, today from the study work to office work, everything was performed through the internet. Any student can read there whole exercise from the internet. Also, people could do business and other different transactions over the internet. Due to the investment in fast internet access by the government, people can transact over the long distance. They should not have to use a road for the purpose of the transactions. For example, when I was at a long distance from my home, I have to interact or talk to my family members. However, the path was too long between us, but due to the efficient access of the internet in the countries, I could have frequently contacted them. Nevertheless, investing in transportation by the government could make me closer to the family. Due to the help of the internet, any person can do a certain job by just sitting at home.
Secondly, for the effective study of any subject material, there would be required good access to the internet. In the internet, we can found each and every topic of the subject material. It would help a lot to any students during the time of examination for the securing of a good grade. My personal experience is a compelling example for this. I frequently used the internet during the time of preparation of my exam. On reading of subject matter in the internet, we can get a lot of information about any type of topic. When we study more things about any topic, we can remember at least some points during the examination. We can be clearly illustrated by the well-labeled diagram over the internet. Moreover, on the occurrence of some types of pandemic disease, students study by sitting in the home. For instance, there is a spread of coronavirus worldwide. In this case, now students were reading by sitting at their homes over the internet. Here, the transportation would not to any sorts of things. The high-speed level of internet would be beneficial during the time of crisis.
In conclusion, increasing the budget on internet access over transportation would be highly beneficial to the overall population of the country. This is because it would help to make easy for the distant transactions, and because of the effective education for today's youth, who are the foundations of the development of the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...in this arena is covered by technology. Every people have varied choices in the wants...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2243.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88671023965 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8598935271 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461873638344 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0789380119 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.3448275862 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8275862069 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34482758621 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 18.0 4.88709677419 368% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183902059606 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527006989196 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418190807083 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119008590608 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0053931503658 0.0645574589148 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.