Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Television is one of the important technology that helps to disseminate information to a wide range of people from a single point of source. Although excessive television watching is detrimental, it would be one of the important sources that can distract the small age--two to five group child and have multiple uses to the parents in this generation. Personally, I feel this way for the following reasons, which I would explore in the following essays.
To begin with, any parents can be enrolled in different activities by allowing their children to look at the advertisements on television. Due to this, parents can do their work freely. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was 4 years old, my parents used to go buy a vegetable market, and any other outside area from home. However, if there is no allowed for television to their for watching an advertisement or different cartoons, then it would be difficult for the parents for proper handling of their children. This is one of the strategies for parents on caring for their babies and working simultaneously at the same instance of time.
Further, watching television by the small age of children can lead to the development of their children--socially and emotionally. On watching television, children can obtain a lot of information. For example, When my brother is five years old, and he used to watch the advertisement of different market products. He often used to watch the picture of hajmola candy. Once, I got stunned by him that he has a stomachache, and thus he said to me that bring me a tablet of hajmola for my ache. This illustrates that a small child has a moldy mind, and can learn anything quickly. Overall, small children should be influenced towards the watching of different advertisements for the development of their minds in each aspect.
Finally, it would be difficult to please small children. By giving them the freedom to watch an advertisement, parents can make their son/daughter happy and shiny face. Otherwise, they could cry and disturbs a lot. To be more specific, the brother of my friends used to cry frequently. In order to make silence and make enrolled or distractions, parents let him watch an advertisement. After watching, he used to smile and start to move here and there with cheerfulness.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that the inclination of children towards the advertisement and cartoons is like killing two birds with a single stone because it would avoid the gloomy face of any child and because parents can be freer in their own task.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'child' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'children'.
Suggestion: children
...stract the small age--two to five group child and have multiple uses to the parents i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, so, then, thus, for example, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90160183066 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04092906093 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482837528604 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 661.5 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8064196705 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1304347826 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04347826087 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21512005066 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060736476457 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750798710216 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123645702144 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411844416868 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.