Do you agree or disagree technology has made children more creative than in the past. support your answer with reasons and examples.
Technology has advanced at an amazing pace and made our lives more effective. With great innovations and cutting-edge technology, people have grown smarter, more intelligent and creative. I strongly agree that children have become more creative than past generations, harnessing the power of technology. I would substantiate my opinion with two reasons and justify my arguments.
Nowadays, children are inherently much more smarter than their past century counterparts since early inception of gadgets in their livelihood. These devices has made them perceive the world in a challenging way. They are much more driven, patient and much more ambitious. Furthermore, they are willing to do what it takes to solve a problem in their own way, by thinking out of the box and coming up with a nifty solution. For instance, my neighbour's kid who is seven years old has come up with a unique and creative solution. He has designed an application which tackles the issue of climate change wherein, his application helps a user identify garbage and inform the civic authorities about it immediately. Therefore, using the limitless power of technology he has not only identified a problem but provided a fascinating and creative solution.
Secondly, the past generation of children did not have the benefits of technology at their disposal readily. Children were not taken seriously and not given very important jobs to do. There was a lack of awareness of technology. On the other hand, these days children have smartphone which gives these children a platform to utilize the cornucopia of resources available on the internet at very cheap prices. This has elevated their creative thinking and magnified their thought process. For example, my brother's friend started working on his Youtube channel at the age of six years and would review toys. His channel, now has more than one million subscribers. His passion and creative thinking of reviewing toys helped him do something unthinkable a decade back.
Therefore, to conclude, I would state that technology has enormous power, which if used efficaciously can lead to a better world. It helps us generate ideas, challenge ourselves to think better and come up with innovative solutions. Hence, technological advancements has improved the creativity of this generation's kids.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... two reasons and justify my arguments. Nowadays, children are inherently much m...
^^^
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'smarter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: smarter
... Nowadays, children are inherently much more smarter than their past century counterparts si...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...gets in their livelihood. These devices has made them perceive the world in a chall...
^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a challenging way" with adverb for "challenging"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...evices has made them perceive the world in a challenging way. They are much more driven, patient and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...at technology has enormous power, which if used efficaciously can lead to a better...
^^
Line 9, column 299, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ncements has improved the creativity of this generations kids. ...
^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f this generations kids.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43206521739 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93824147019 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595108695652 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0126458175 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8636363636 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27019617683 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733176757783 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539352798502 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164462061718 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656738940409 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.