Do you agree or disagree: the universities should spend more money in improving facilities (libraries, computer labs) than hiring famous teachers.
It is indisputable that education plays a pivotal role in student's life. But to take the education to a next level, people debate over whether universities should spend more funding on facilities over on hiring famous teachers. The answer differs considerably from individual to individual. As far as I am concerned, I agree that schools should put facilities as the main priority. My arguments for this point are listed as follows.
To start with, teachers come and go, but facilities and equipment improvement can last for a long time. Take my own university for example, last year our school funded a colossal amount of money to construct a new gym for the students, since the previous one was out-dated. Under this circumstance, more and more student tend to spend time in the gym and workout. With sufficient excercise, not only can it improve our body physically, but also mentally by relieving our stress during this competetive era. Moreover, when students attain a healthier body, they can have more energy on studying too. Based on this experience, spending money on facilities can bring a variety of benefits and can be utilized for a longer period.
In addition, by improving facilities, it can enhance one student's wisdom. Schools that lack resourses and equipment is unlikely to cultivate outstanding students. Top schools in the world hold high quality devices, high speed computers, large library, and so on. Only with these facilities and environment can it allow one student to dig in deeper researches and obtain a broader amount of knowledge. For instance, back in the days when I was in junior high school, our school's library did not want to spend money to install air conditioners. Therefore, during season like the summer, rarely any student will use the library due to the hot weather. As a result, without a good environment, student's studying quality will also be greatly diminished.
Admittedly, everthing has two sides and some may claim that only famous teachers can provide better lectures. To illustrate, these teachers usually receive higher payments from the school, in return they will put more effort on their education material for their students. While it may be true in the past, however, teachers today are equiped with more comprehensive and uniformed education system. Therefore, the average standard of the teacher's skill and knowledge are relatively more close compared to the past.
All in all, taking into accounts these factors, universities should definitely put more focus on the school's facility, since it can bring long-term benefit and provide a more suitable environment for the students to study. That is not to say that other opinions are completely out of merits. Nevertheless, I strongly believe that my points of view are fully capable of firmly supporting my position.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... As far as I am concerned, I agree that schools should put facilities as the mai...
^^
Line 7, column 439, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... Therefore, the average standard of the teachers skill and knowledge are relatively more...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 102, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...should definitely put more focus on the schools facility, since it can bring long-term ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16052060738 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81640022698 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555314533623 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0904187428 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.16 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.44 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173841568547 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453374799888 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589617901176 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102852603579 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638739014869 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.