Risk is a part of life and so is true for challenges in life, whether it is thrown by life at us or we throw it for ourselves. Each new challenge or a problem leaves a lesson which is sometimes full of good things and sometimes worse; But, each risk teaches us something whether to follow it next time or drop it. Each previous risk experience motivates us to take another risk. In my opinion successful people try new things and take risk rather than doing only what they already know. Ample amount of reasons can given in support of answers and few are mentioned below.
First and most important key aspect is that phobia of trying new risk will never allow us to explore invention successfully. For instance, had edison averted experimenting with new elements then bulb would have never light up to brighten our lives today. Similarly, if bill gates would have never dared to take up the risk of inventing a new touch operating system windows 8 and 10, then we would have never worked with touch screen laptops or computer systems. Regardless, people who are afraid of taking risk often fail to try and test their own working limits and never get to know what possibilities they have in themselves to endure in future.
Secondly, this era demands risk and innovation which only people enduring risk can survive. For example, no company wants an employee who is afraid of taking risks and is unable to face challenges; And, in order to survive and live a healthy life one has to be competant enough to defeat and give risk another chance to excel at work. As, this is how key to invention describes itself, a vital element of success both for world and personal growth. On the contrary, people preffering not to withstand challenges and risk, fail to achieve success and are known mostly for few skills to be utilised in the advancement of society.
To summarize the idea entirely or to present an abstract idea, I would recapitualise that success only comes to those to welcome it open heartedly, accepting all its challenges and risk worth taking. This is how we humans have been able to touch moon and mars because fear isn't for great and success is only for great.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...are afraid of taking risk often fail to try and test their own working limits and never...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ities they have in themselves to endure in future. Secondly, this era demands risk and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ble to touch moon and mars because fear isnt for great and success is only for great...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66233766234 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46935817626 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2777176181 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280114652613 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103272951111 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147162129693 0.0737576698707 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15532890421 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738796223562 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.