Twenty-first century is an era of highly skilled and technically advanced people. The number of skills in the market are emerging with the evolution of new business trends and demands of technology, but to what extent these skills will mushroom is something no one can predict. People who develop different skills are more successful or people who develop one skill is highly debated. To my perception, the people developing skill related to one particular domain are more successful. Below mentioned are some noticable points in the support of idea.
Firstly, focusing on one skill is more easier than everything all together. It takes time to learn one particular skill, followed by time to convert that it into a perfect skill also needs time so, it becomes tough for people to focus on many skills all at once. After the completion of one skill, other skill can be learned which might be time consuming. For instance, due to busy schedule people don't have much time to learn too many things at the same time so, they focus on improvising one skill more in order to excel or to take their career to a next level in that particular domain. However, people focusing on different skills at the same time lack perfection in one thing resulting in chosing the wrong skill path sometimes.
Secondly, jobs are domain specific or skill specific and not multi-skill specified. For instance, a coder can't be a business manger at the same time, because management people are often the ones' having management degree but, coder can pursue business management course in order to become businness manager which might result in leaving his previous skill set of core coding.
To sum up the entire perception, I would say that different skills might enable us to do multi-tasking but will hinder us from the expertise that we can have therefore, person with one skill is more successful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...a. Firstly, focusing on one skill is more easier than everything all together. It takes ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r instance, due to busy schedule people dont have much time to learn too many things...
^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...-skill specified. For instance, a coder cant be a business manger at the same time, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: MANGER_MANAGER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'business manager'?
Suggestion: business manager
...cified. For instance, a coder cant be a business manger at the same time, because management pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9213836478 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5969835965 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544025157233 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.5086729934 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.384615385 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47238364084 0.236089414692 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205498704081 0.076458572812 269% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199932620383 0.0737576698707 271% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280790151688 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171497958001 0.0645574589148 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.