People who develop different skills are more successful than people who develop one skill only.
At the turn of the new century, with the development of human's modern society, people more and more tend to increase the level of their literacy. Actually, no one can turn a blind eye to the profound effects of being knowledgeable and being skillful in a person's future. A simple recognition of this argument lends our discussion to the questions of whether people expand their knowledge in one field or more than one field. Although some people adhere to this belief that having different skills lead to extraordinary future, in my vantage point, they should raise their skills in only one field since they can find decent job, and also strengthen their efficiency.
The first aspect to point out is that what provokes people to concentrate on just one skill is finding a proper occupation in future. It is absolutely undeniable that at 20th and 21st centuries with the improvement of technology and galloping rate of science, jobs are being specialized and sophisticated so much so that everyone in charge of a particular job should enjoy a great amount of experiences in one field. That is why employees need to focus on just field. To illustrate more, take a case of a computer engineer who improves his skills in programming for instance. It is axiomatic that he can solve every problem in an incredibly ingenious way. Hence, every reputed company tries to stimulate him in order to hire him in its company by offering high salary.
The further subtle point is that increasing a person's productivity can be considered another advantage of focusing on one field. As a matter of fact, technology nowadays is drastically improved, so nobody can enrich his knowledge in varied fields. Without a shadow of doubt, if a person just improves his skills in one field, not only can he enrich his skills efficiently, but also he can broaden his horizon. Moreover, although they may find focusing on a field is boring, they soon notice its tangible benefits through their superb performance during their lives. On the other hand, a person who tries to enhance his skills in varied subjects will overwhelmed by stress and he surely cannot handle all materials effectively. According to the recent research conducted in my country, psychologists are in the conviction that if someone improves his skills in various fields, he will get confused; therefore he cannot make progress efficiently in his life.
On the whole, according to the above-mentioned details and points, it is crystal-clear that improving skills in just one skill can be highly beneficial because people can find a proper job, and also improve their productivity. It is high time we stopped overlooking the fact that a person by having various skills in different fields can make headway in his life. Have you ever seen a person who finds a decent job without having deep knowledge in one field? Can you considered a successful person without having deep knowledge? I absolutely believe no!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 124, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ne skill is finding a proper occupation in future. It is absolutely undeniable that at 20...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...rther subtle point is that increasing a persons productivity can be considered another ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'overwhelm'
Suggestion: overwhelm
...ance his skills in varied subjects will overwhelmed by stress and he surely cannot handle a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'as a matter of fact', 'on the whole', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.22550831793 0.229887763892 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.15157116451 0.158761421928 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0776340110906 0.0866891130778 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0536044362292 0.046263068375 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0757855822551 0.0685040099705 111% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140480591497 0.118717715034 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0499075785582 0.0351676179071 142% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82697372301 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0258780036969 0.0309702414327 84% => OK
Particles: 0.00184842883549 0.00188951952338 98% => OK
Determiners: 0.083179297597 0.0887237588012 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0332717190388 0.0209618222197 159% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00924214417745 0.0139019557991 66% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2952.0 2387.08602151 124% => OK
No of words: 495.0 408.028673835 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96363636364 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48200974243 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.39595959596 0.338922669872 117% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.258585858586 0.251872472559 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.187878787879 0.174417080927 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133333333333 0.112833075102 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82697372301 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513131313131 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 60.7460921744 59.2087087015 103% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.5714285714 20.5533526081 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3855687132 48.84282405 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.571428571 120.699889404 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.5533526081 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.761904761905 0.644075263715 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 49.43001443 45.7405998639 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.48026315789 1.45489161554 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141728347095 0.300154397459 47% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113158169876 0.103427244359 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.107389425234 0.0752933317313 143% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.467863495161 0.497263757937 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.131922337653 0.151897553556 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514440295094 0.114077575197 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456958728784 0.0781384742642 58% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.394731015301 0.336927656856 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00355489143704 0.067059652881 5% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103095758044 0.210909579961 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315203506398 0.0618886996521 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.86379928315 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.