Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person. However, some people think that is a good quality for a person
At the turn of the new century, there is no doubt that people encounter with catastrophic situations that they should make rational decisions and no one can turn a blind eye to the direct and indirect effects of these decisions on people’s future lives. Although some people adhere to this belief that taking a lot of time can be considered as a positive parameter for person’s personality, in my vantage point it is a negative element for a person’s characteristic since making immediate decisions reflects a person’s analytical ability, and also the person can grasp valuable opportunities.
The first aspect to point out is that what provokes people to make quick decisions is showing their analytical ability. As a matter of fact, one of the rigors of modern hectic life is that people’s lives have a lot of ups and downs and people face with complicated situations that they need to cope with these problems as soon as possible. It is axiomatic that individuals can prove their analytical abilities in these critical situations. To illustrate more, take a case of a person who runs into a huge problem and he has a lot of financial concerns for instance. He should gather enough information, broaden his horizons and analyze the situations and then make a rational decision about how he can solve his problem. in this way, not only does he find best feet forward, but also he prove his ingenious manner to other people. Hence, making quick decision can be highly beneficial.
The further subtle point is that seizing precious opportunities can be considered another remarkable advantage of making immediate decisions. It is absolutely undeniable, in the competitive world of today, people should grasp opportunities in order to make promising future for themselves. In this way, they need to be health-conscious because opportunities may vanish in a blink of an eye. In my own experience, last year my close friend introduced two companies which employed specialist computer programmer but I could not make quick decision; consequently, neither did I grasp opportunities, nor could I find decent job in my field. Had I had made immediate decision, I could gained a horde of money and revolutionized my life by working in prestigious company. Therefore, if a person cannot make decision quickly and in a short time, he will lose the best chances which may bring bright future for him.
On the whole, according to above-mentioned points and ideas, it is crystal-clear that making quick decision can be considered as a significant merit’s of individuals since it reflects their analytical ability, and also they can seize opportunities. It is high time overlooking the fact that a person who has hard time for decision-making is a worthy person. Have you ever seen a prosperous person without analytical ability? Can you consider a person successful without grasping opportunities? I absolutely believe no!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 727, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ion about how he can solve his problem. in this way, not only does he find best fe...
^^
Line 2, column 757, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'find the best'.
Suggestion: find the best
... problem. in this way, not only does he find best feet forward, but also he prove his ing...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 793, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'proves'.
Suggestion: proves
... he find best feet forward, but also he prove his ingenious manner to other people. H...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'gain'
Suggestion: gain
... I had made immediate decision, I could gained a horde of money and revolutionized my ...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'no doubt', 'as a matter of fact', 'on the whole']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234862385321 0.229887763892 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.143119266055 0.158761421928 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.11376146789 0.0866891130778 131% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0366972477064 0.046263068375 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0678899082569 0.0685040099705 99% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111926605505 0.118717715034 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0311926605505 0.0351676179071 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.20183209839 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0183486238532 0.0309702414327 59% => OK
Particles: 0.00183486238532 0.00188951952338 97% => OK
Determiners: 0.0844036697248 0.0887237588012 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0366972477064 0.0209618222197 175% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0110091743119 0.0139019557991 79% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2942.0 2387.08602151 123% => OK
No of words: 478.0 408.028673835 117% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15481171548 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48200974243 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.372384937238 0.338922669872 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269874476987 0.251872472559 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.228033472803 0.174417080927 131% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.163179916318 0.112833075102 145% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20183209839 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514644351464 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 60.3335928197 59.2087087015 102% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.9 20.5533526081 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.6309613153 48.84282405 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.1 120.699889404 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 20.5533526081 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.644075263715 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 50.8874476987 45.7405998639 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.52592592593 1.45489161554 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329998856277 0.300154397459 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118077255243 0.103427244359 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0781214002759 0.0752933317313 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.440255514313 0.497263757937 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156003298601 0.151897553556 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113983559254 0.114077575197 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901848355897 0.0781384742642 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.317872576632 0.336927656856 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0989466728782 0.067059652881 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241273367195 0.210909579961 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042644554903 0.0618886996521 69% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.86379928315 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.4623655914 244% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.