In a lot of workplaces workers have to do a certain routine work every single day. Basically, they have not gained any new skills since they have started their employment. But isn't that just boring? Could they be more effective, if they had the opportunity to be more in control? I believe the diversity in your job can have a role in helping you to be ambitious and enthusiastic enough to deliver a proper outcome for your company or department. Reasons for this assertion has been mentioned below.
To start, one reason that many workers suffer from doing the same task every day is because, they have always been controlled by their leaders. Managers often use their employees to obtain what they want without enrolling them in the actual important part of the job and hearing their perspective and ideas. When people for you feel that their power has been taken, they start doing the job just for the payment. Even if that means spending a huge amount of their day doing the same thing everyday. But when people have their voice heard and they start believing that their voice matters, they will dedicate their energy and power in doing as much task as possible in order to get a better result. Additionally, in this way they will never be bored. Tired maybe, but not bored.
As well as that, although people are usually more keen on tasks which they are familiar with, learning new tasks and realizing how much more you are capable of doing can bring so much joy to people. By other means, developing new skills can be frustrating however, once you are familiar with all its aspects and how you can receive the best performance, you will not regret starting it. Therefore, I can never accept that sometimes people believe it is better to stick to old and same task just because it seems easier. This is like saying government should have always written everything down because learning how computers work is hard.
To sum up, I think workers will be much more satisfied when they are in need to do multiple tasks and are more involved. The reason that this is not the case in so many companies is because the managers are incapable of pushing their people further and further and letting know that their role matters. So, I think the most important criteria is that the employee knows that they are needed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In a lot of workplaces workers have to d...
^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...they have started their employment. But isnt that just boring? Could they be more ef...
^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...art doing the job just for the payment. Even if that means spending a huge amount of th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...mount of their day doing the same thing everyday. But when people have their voice heard...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...learning how computers work is hard. To sum up, I think workers will be much ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, i think, as well as, to sum up, as well as that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67481662592 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32010145004 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506112469438 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.780549458 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.45 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0378615550598 0.236089414692 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0122462025983 0.076458572812 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220432457027 0.0737576698707 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0257395604636 0.150856017488 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180161830828 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.