famous
when it comes to the question that whether famous people's opinions are important for younger people or older ones, it brings up a controvercial debate. opinions vary from person to person. Some hold the opinion that older people follow the opinions of celebrities as younger people do. Others hold the opinion that younger people are so eager than older people regarding the opinions of renowned people. Personally, I think that younger individuals are in the group that follow celebrities more for two reasons. I will explicate my reasons behind this argument through the following essay.
The first reason that immediately comes into mind is that younger people constitute the majority of their advoecats as well as the older people were the biggset groups of the advocats of their own time celebrities. For exmple, my grand father has the pictures of famus people of his time any where in his room, in contrast, I also have contemporary celebrities pictures in my room.
The second reason that makes me hold this belief is that older people's attitudes can be different than younger people with respect to the opinions of today's celebrities. To be more specific, younger people expreience huge amonut of fresh perspectives than older people. These fresh perspectives may not be acceptable for older people since their attitudes have made over time were fixed and not open to new opinions.
To wrap it up, I strongly believe that the opinions of famous people are more significant for younger people than older people. This is because numbers of celebrities's advocats are younger people and because older people's opinions that evolve over time can be different than contemporary opinions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
when it comes to the question that whether f...
^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Opinions
..., it brings up a controvercial debate. opinions vary from person to person. Some hold t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...he pictures of famus people of his time any where in his room, in contrast, I also have c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...lder peoples attitudes can be different than younger people with respect to the opin...
^^^^
Line 13, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople than older people. This is because numbers of celebritiess advocats are you...
^^^
Line 13, column 273, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... that evolve over time can be different than contemporary opinions.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, well, i think, in contrast, as well as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 276.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17753623188 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62755611638 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481884057971 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3235573634 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.923076923 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0488370805569 0.236089414692 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261940370809 0.076458572812 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061460114792 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0377472691559 0.150856017488 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401044698235 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.