Technology is diversifying at an unprecented rate and there is no aspect of life that is untouched by it. It has deeply penetrated into our daily lives and revolutionized some areas forever - changed car industry completely, developed gadgets that we could not have imagine and increased our health standards substantially. In the recent times, education sector is witnessing an immense influx of technology that has changed the relationship of teachers and students significantly. From hardcover books to digital textbooks and from inclass lectures to online courses, schools are facing an incredible amount of pressure by the technology. At such a point of time, one is compelled to think whether conventional schools be replaced by modern computers and television? I believe that no matter how outdated schools may sound, no technology can replace them. To bolster my opinion, I have cited examples and situation which proove that schools are the better form of learning.
Firstly, online courses such as MOOC (free courses) are gaining traction in the young generation who prefer to learn at their convinient place and time. A lot of websites and companies are providing a platheora of courses ranging from kindergarden lessons to advanced mathematics, thereby giving a stiff competition to the schools and institutions. However, they can not replace the classroom teaching as they lack essential elements that are embedded in one to one training. A school teacher understands her students personally and leaves no stone unturned to guide them in the right path be it career or personal. Such a level of interaction can not be obtained by the virtual teachers who are sitting at the other corner of the world.
Secondly, when students go to schools, they get a unique oppurtunity to meet and befriend pupils from different background and cultures. In this way, students learn various aspects of life that parents can not teach. For example, in my high school I got an oppurtunity to interact with an exchange student from Syria. During her one year program, we discussed on numerous topics not limited to cultures, history, arts, and famous monuments. Once I invited her for dinner and she most impressed by the Indian food and hospitality. Remebering this incident, I realized that such oppurtunitites are missing in the online culture of schooling.
Some may argue that by the use of internet technology, we can gain access to plethora of knowledge at home and save our commutation time. I too agree with this view but not completely. Schools not only provide the requisite academic knowledge, but also impart them important lessons namely, leadership qualities, moral education, etc. that are critical in their career ahead.
In the end, people who compare the coverted schools with petty technology and plan to subsitute them forever, should consider again and understand the benefits of classroom training.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'imagined'.
Suggestion: imagined
...eveloped gadgets that we could not have imagine and increased our health standards subs...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...line culture of schooling. Some may argue that by the use of internet technology,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, as for, for example, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2457.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91542097966 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587606837607 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 764.1 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7090018073 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.826086957 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.347826087 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.60869565217 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14114649034 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364870638787 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403594109143 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693390864528 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346720889333 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 86.8835125448 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.