Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
As far as I am concerned, it is more beneficial governments allocate a great amount of money in support of Olympic teams because not only are people more interested in sports but also, it inspires people. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint my case.
The first reason worth mentioning is that most people around the world enjoy watching sport's competitions. One of the reasons that sport has a lot of viewers is that it helps people of societies to forget their hectic life and arduous responsibilities. It should be mentioned that arts are more intellectual and innovative than sports; nevertheless, it is not suitable for a lot of people. People do not appreciate works of art, and also do not know famous artists. Nevertheless, well-known men in sport are known by a great percentage of people. These persons encourage many people around the world and their behaviors have extraordinary influences on society. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo is one of the best players in football in history and everyone knows him. He always asks people to donate blood to clinics and because of that, since many individuals respect him severely, they will answer his request by donating blood.
A furthur more subtle point is that member of group sport team has an interesting life inspired people. Some of them had a very sad background and poor life and since many young people have the same situation as them, pay attention to them. For instance, one of the celebrities in our country had a very difficult childhood. His father was addicted to drugs and also, lost his mother because of a disease. He worked at different places and after trying really hard and allocating a lot of time to improve his life, he got a part in a series and after that he become famous. His past life can be an impetus for a lot of people and give them hope to be positive about the future.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, due to having more fans and viewers and encouraging people, there are more advantages in spending money to support athletics by governments. Consequently, it is highly recommended that organizations related to the government pay more attention to the sport since its effect is undeniable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, nevertheless, really, so, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86614173228 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85547899791 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561679790026 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4921561389 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160587869215 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452075176325 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798674936213 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129470344127 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943185231215 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.