Has TV destroyed our life

An invention of the new technological era, many people have deemed television as an obstacle for normal communication in the family and among friends. Although there may be some negative effects of television's presence in our lives, the positive ones are incontrovertible and even more compelling. TV is an acknowledged medium of communication that broadens our knowledge, thus providing more topics of conversation among friends and family.
Though the indiscriminate watching of TV programs tends to create inhumane zombies, addicted to the screen, and incapable of normal communication, few people actually come down to this stare. On the contrary, the discriminating choice of TV programs could enrich people's view and make them feel more knowledgeable in their fields of work, thus getting capable of a more fulfilling communication with others.
At home, television can always create a warm atmosphere. Imagine a family in front of the TV watching a favorite funny show, laughing, and sharing a common enjoyment. At Christmas and New Year's Eve, for example, there are shows that contribute to the celebratory atmosphere at home.

Although television is said to take up much of the time that we are supposed to spend with our friends, it does not, in fact, spoil communication between friends. It can even provide diverse topics for conversation, help friends share opinions and interests, and if those are not enough help to find friends.
In brief, television has proved to be a plentiful source of information for people of different tastes. consequently, it has much contributed to more enriching and fulfilling communication among family and friends. and although some "enemies" of the technological world try to dismiss it, television has become an inseparable part of our everyday life, making communication more enjoyable.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...rmation for people of different tastes. consequently, it has much contributed to more enrich...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 215, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...communication among family and friends. and although some 'enemies' of th...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, if, may, so, thus, for example, in brief, in fact, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 288.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43055555556 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32022160823 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579861111111 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8757679116 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137377875476 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454641516025 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491238065401 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698454111971 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262517897726 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.