have a knowledge a variety of subjects or have in specialize subject
I think that our job defines the areas that we should develop our self in. Many jobs require from us deep knowledge in specific region in order to solve many issues. For this purposes, I think that we should specialize in one specific subject. However there are many people agree that we should have broad knowledge of many academic subjects. I strongly agree the specialization issue.
First of all, I think that having deep information in one subject helps us to be able to introduce high performance in the work. We may face many problem need intelligence to solve, so I think that If we have good background and detailed information we can come with creative ideas. So here we need variety solutions. Those will be closer to the final academic subject not for the general classes. My experience a compelling example of this. When I was working in the airport, the company showed problem to all the engineers in my team about how to help the company to reduce the amount of the fuel needed for the engine to turn on. I found that 50 percent was mechanical engineers ,so they could not solve this problem because they have general information a bout the engine. But me and other two engineers solved the problem by changing the composition of the fuel and to increase the concentration of one substance. This problem showed the creativity brought be the extended knowledge.
Secondly, I think that this way helps us to raise both our degree in the work, in order to reach to higher seat in the company, and to increase our salary so we can improve our life. As much you have more certificates in one field you can upgrade your job position to higher because always we start from the less clever needed-position then to the more sensitive regions. For instance, My father was a teacher for kids in Arabic major, but when he completed the mater he started to study in the high class. After this he took the PHd, so he studied in the university. His salary and his position upgraded to higher level. We all was too happy for him.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that we should specialize in certain subject to increase our performance and to raise our position and our salary to higher degree.
- argument if the dinosaurs is endotherm or not.73
- in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today?agree or not60
- some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed, other people believe that zoos serve useful functions,which view point do you support?70
- in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today.60
- some young adults prefer independence from their parents,while others prefer to live with their families,which case you prefer?71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: THIS_NNS
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
...gion in order to solve many issues. For this purposes, I think that we should specia...
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...uld specialize in one specific subject. However there are many people agree that we sho...
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
... I think that If we have good background and detailed information we can come wit...
Line 2, column 682, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
...that 50 percent was mechanical engineers ,so they could not solve this problem bec...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, as to, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63333333333 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5988529812 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489743589744 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1960372428 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0476190476 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179488335839 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533646571491 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615845972119 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115011166783 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056921810678 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.