Foccusing in what kind of information more, has always been a noteworthy matter when it comes to talking about the all university student. That is owing to the fact that no one can deny the profound effect of the university student in the future of the society. There are a plethora of people who contend that it is require to take history course for all the university student, regardless of their field. Others disagree. I, to a great extent, corroborate the first perspective as it seems rational and fruitful. In what follows, I will attemp to clarify the reasons in support of my viewpoint in detail.
To commence with, the most imperative reason comes to mind is that they should know more about the history of their society and the whole world since it can get them the reliable source of information about the future. Let me say about the research which I read it the last week. In this research, social researcher put high emphasis on the effect of knowing about the history and how the people react in different situation of their country. The result was so impresive and they found that in all progresive societies, all the people had more study about the history. As you can see, it is clear that the requirement of taking history course in universities can have significant effect.
Another exquisite point to be mentioned is about the speech of the history researcher, Dr. Ghomshei which my father always allude to him. As he said in one of his speech; "It is conspicuous that the event in the world are repetative and if you consider the long shot of the world, you can better find this repetition". He is the most my father and I admire and depend on his speech, the more we want to know about the future event, the more we should know about the past. If I consider the last 50 years of my country which I read about it more, I would have found that he was right since there were a plethora of events which repeat in different era.
To wrap it all up, taking the aforementioned idea into consideration, we may draw the conclusion that not only can knowing more about the history, broad the university students horizon but also they would have better react in different situation of their society. So, it is highly recommended that set a law to take a history course for every student as an obligatory course.
- history courses for students 73
- TPO 50 3
- TPO 51 3
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
...ethora of people who contend that it is require to take history course for all the univ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: taking
...f people who contend that it is require to take history course for all the university s...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 689, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iversities can have significant effect. Another exquisite point to be mentioned ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, kind of, talking about, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63069544365 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60450423515 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489208633094 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.4574126786 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.6875 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0625 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21250563488 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786075568176 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125399294169 0.0737576698707 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158827603854 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100577457284 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.