How do movies or television influence people's behavior? use reasons and specific examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, movies and television shows play a significant role in people's lives. They affect many different aspects of our society and their influence is reaching far deep to modify people's behaviour. In my opinion, movies and TV shows could influence behaviour in a negative or positive way.
First of all, some movies could have a large negative impact by introducing undesirable role-models. we see now the exaggerations in the "Anti-hero" characters in movies. This character acts badly around people, ignores rules and glorify excessive alcohol consumption. Unfortunately, this comes to take big part in our popular culture. My own experience is a compelling example on this. One of my friends in high school was a straight A student. I remember how his behaviour changed when he started watching these movies, which give impression that consuming vast amount of narcotics is not only amusing but a desirable behaviour. He began to struggle with his grades and barely finished high school. He ended up unemployed now with no prospect of finding a job. Had he never watched these shows, he would not have put himself in this desperate situation today.
On the other hand, other movies offer positive role-models. shows which picture good families are desirable. These programs always showcase a functioning and stable families. there might be some regular life or day to day struggle but overall a positive value is emphasized. This definitely helps build the society morale. My own family used to watch a wonderful drama show from which we could certainly take inspiration. Although we did not perfectly live up to the ideals presented in it, it helped modify our behaviour for the good.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that the effect of the entertainment industry on our society is undeniable. Sometimes it contributes positively to society by introducing positive values which people could emulate. Other times, it could end up with a detrimental disastrous effect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...cant role in peoples lives. They affect many different aspects of our society and their influe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...by introducing undesirable role-models. we see now the exaggerations in the '...
^^
Line 5, column 873, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...self in this desperate situation today. On the other hand, other movies offer po...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 61, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Shows
...ther movies offer positive role-models. shows which picture good families are desirab...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...case a functioning and stable families. there might be some regular life or day to da...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p with a detrimental disastrous effect.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.265625 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03067649214 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628125 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3404126986 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.2608695652 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9130434783 20.6045352989 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52173913043 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0864780491239 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237223478839 0.076458572812 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037380951842 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601961300333 0.150856017488 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566233120286 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.