Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect in your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
-Say nothing
Without any shadow of doubt, facing awkward social situations are inevitable. Although some people might adhere to the idea that correcting people is a kind of matter that should be take cared of right away, others possess the it is not necessary to say anything. As far as I am concerned, in such cases, it is more appropriate to wait until the meeting or class is over, then talk to the lecturer. I will elaborate on my reasons in the following paragraphs.
To start with, one should take into account that interrupting the person who is talking may cause him a distraction. Abrupt distractions like that, not only make the speaker to lose his concentration, but also cause him nervousness. They could lose the track of their thoughts, and as a result, the rest of the class or meeting will be a dead end. Relevant studies indicate that being corrected too much, will eventually make the person cold-feet about speaking in a group. In a five-year survey two groups of people were considered as subjects. The first group was supposed to correct the lecturer every time just in time, on the other hand, the second group had to write down the mistakes and give feedbacks after the speech. The result asserts that after being four times interrupted while speaking, people get 26% more reluctant to give a speech.
Another key thing I would to mention is that there is the chance that the teacher or meeting leader to find out he has made a mistake, and corrects it after that. It is a generally held believe that being inpatient in such situations brings up unpleasant consequences. For instance, the teacher’s feelings might get hurt, or feel embarrassment. Take a personal experience as an example: I remember I attended in a team meeting at my office. The manager who was the team leader, announced some wrong statistics, and I immediately cut his sentence trying to correct him. His face blushed, his voice got down and for some moments he could not speak. Then he went through his notes and said he had the right numbers. I still feel bad about that day, and always try to wait for the right time to speak in such occasions.
To bring everything in conclusion, I am of the view that it is not polite to provide right away interruptions when someone is speaking. Not to mention that regardless what they are talking about, it causes the speaker distractions and take away their chance to correct themselves. It is recommended that to wait the lecture to be conducted, and then correct the mistake provided that the speaker did not correct himself. I believe the value of some correct information pales in comparison to the prejudice of people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taken'?
Suggestion: taken
...ople is a kind of matter that should be take cared of right away, others possess the...
^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...ake cared of right away, others possess the it is not necessary to say anything. As fa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, second, so, still, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, talking about, as a result, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2194.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74891774892 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72026172296 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536796536797 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0553313809 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3913043478 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0869565217 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65217391304 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193160856515 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492310399602 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441391434278 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119448957433 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324085140971 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.