Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
-Say nothing.
There is no doubt that the right behavior and making the best decision in the critical situations play the prominent role in people's work lives. No one can blind eye to these factors' influence on one's being success. A controversial question is raised related to the issue is that how should we behave when one teacher or leader in one important meeting says the incorrect things. Some people may hold this viewpoint that we should interrupt and correct the mistake. However, others look this concept from the different lens and believe that we should behave in polite way. In my perspective, the second belief is true and being silent and waiting until finishing the meeting can be proper in this situation. I will pinpoint some of my outstanding reasons.
One of the most predominant reason coming mind related to the issue is that being polite is necessary for all relations. If we interrupt the meeting in order to compensate the teacher or leader's mistake, it is a really rude behavior. Take Albert Einstein as an example. He wrote in his biography book that when he had a meeting with some of American Navy's leaders with president of USA, Although one of the senior leaders made a mistake about one physical problem, he was quiet until finishing the meeting and after that said to the leader his mistake owing to being polite and not bothering anyone. Therefore, saying nothing on that time and waiting until the meeting is over can be better.
Furthermore, the other equally principal reason supported my idea is that the teachers or leaders probably are the important persons and can be beneficial for us in our future lives. They can be bothered from this adverse behavior. So, in the future, they probably would not help us. From psychological stand point, this behavior will be as a black spot on their mind and would not be erased. Consequently, when they think about us or hear over names that behavior will be memorized for them and will not advocate us. This means that by controlling our behavior through the one moment, we can guarantee our future lives.
The last but not the least reason is that although being honest and having high self-confidence are two important feature to be prosper, sometimes we should lie and confirm the one person who say the erroneous things. This is because of situation and our condition that we want to reserve our thriving in the future. Assume Mr. Ahmadinejad's authorities in Iran government. The Authorities always proved the saying of president, although in most of times they were wrong. They did this to retain their possessions and guarantees their situations in the future. Therefore, being not honest in some times has many advantageous to our conditions.
From what has been mentioned, we can safely reach to the conclusion that being silent through the meeting and saying the wrong thing to the leaders or teachers after meeting is more beneficial. It is hard to disguise that saying the mistake in that time by interrupting the meeting can show our self-confidence. Despite of this fact, behaving in polite way is more hospitable in that time. All in all. It is anticipated that people will pay attention more to be polite, if they want to be success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'feature' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'features'.
Suggestion: features
... high self-confidence are two important feature to be prosper, sometimes we should lie ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 440, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the times') or simply say ''most times''.
Suggestion: most of the times; most times
...ed the saying of president, although in most of times they were wrong. They did this to retai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'no doubt']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.192307692308 0.229887763892 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.177257525084 0.158761421928 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0836120401338 0.0866891130778 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0418060200669 0.046263068375 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0685618729097 0.0685040099705 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123745819398 0.118717715034 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0518394648829 0.0351676179071 147% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6465311499 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0250836120401 0.0309702414327 81% => OK
Particles: 0.00167224080268 0.00188951952338 89% => OK
Determiners: 0.110367892977 0.0887237588012 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0334448160535 0.0209618222197 160% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0117056856187 0.0139019557991 84% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3216.0 2387.08602151 135% => OK
No of words: 551.0 408.028673835 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83666061706 5.86048508987 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84493438435 4.48200974243 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.344827586207 0.338922669872 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255898366606 0.251872472559 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.166969147005 0.174417080927 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10889292196 0.112833075102 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6465311499 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466424682396 0.524397521467 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 55.3315605002 59.2087087015 93% => OK
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6684587814 140% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5533526081 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0346840195 48.84282405 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.896551724 120.699889404 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.5533526081 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.413793103448 0.644075263715 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 44.5898366606 45.7405998639 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.27906976744 1.45489161554 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.558758512 0.300154397459 186% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0952656298305 0.103427244359 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0573865136235 0.0752933317313 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.462630774523 0.497263757937 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.162839868052 0.151897553556 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189042711013 0.114077575197 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143949834729 0.0781384742642 184% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.394625270347 0.336927656856 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.096650730644 0.067059652881 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.402543406193 0.210909579961 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107416013527 0.0618886996521 174% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.86379928315 233% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.91756272401 203% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.42114695341 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 2.4623655914 325% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.