Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says
something incorrect in your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the
teacher or meeting leader.
•Say nothing
Over the past years, the issue of whether or not in a meeting people must correct the mistake of lecturer immediately after saying incorrectly, waiting until finishing of the meeting or nothing to say has received a great deal of attention from listeners and correctors. Although some may say that student must not correct mistakes or students ought to correct them immediately in class; I, as well as many others, believe that students and listeners had better correct the mistakes of the lecturer or teachers after a class and presentation.
First of all, an important reason why people would better waiting until the class over is that this behavior is increasing the self-confidence of the lecturer. Many experts believe that people would make mistakes when they speak or teach something in front of the population because they have stress and anxiety. In this situation, if the listener or students want to correct mistakes and faults in front of others, it may increase the lecturer’s stress, and they may feel they cannot continue it. Furthermore, saying mistakes in front of others reduce their self-confidence of speakers.
Another reason for this point of view is that not interrupting speaks of lectures is a sign of respect to them. When people are speaking among populations, they would not like to interrupt their speaking in front of a listener. Many people believe that cutting their speaking is a sign of disrespect, so that listener must be waiting till taking is over. Moreover, by disrupting the lecturer’s talk, they have been forgetting what they want to say, and it makes disorder in the meeting. Also, maybe ones do not prefer to saying their wrongs in front of the public. They believe that this behavior reduces their worthwhile among listeners.
Finally, it is occasionally said that it may the listener does not understand the issue and makes a mistake. In other words, at the beginning of speaking the listener may not get the purpose of the lecturer or misunderstand the goal of the subject. In many cases, by continuing the explaining of the lecture, the listener understands their first impression of the lecture is incorrect, and they select the best option. However, if ones disrupt the speakers’ speaks wrongly, it would negative effects on the speaker’s view about the listeners.
In conclusion, considering the ideas presented in the paragraphs above, I personally believe that waiting for the finishing of the meeting and then correct the mistakes of the speakers in a private situation the better than saying in front of the population chiefly due to respect to the lecturers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
Over the past years, the issue of whether or not in a meeting people must correct the mi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 523, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'say'?
Suggestion: say
...ting. Also, maybe ones do not prefer to saying their wrongs in front of the public. Th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in many cases, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10623556582 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82142995909 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454965357968 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.7650741861 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.058823529 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4705882353 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.17647058824 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184664322605 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577472211331 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648919106249 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1130997209 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802810266156 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.