integrated task
The reading states that it is possible and beneficial to establish colonies of humans in the asteroids and provides three key reasons to support this view. However, the lecturer finds all these reasons implausible, and says that the idea of colonies is not practical now.
First, the reading argues that due to low gravity of asteroids, the landing and taking off is easier and safer for the spacecrafts. Also, the spaceships can carry more pieces of equipment. On the other hand, the professor highlights the fact that low gravity can cause serious risks for astronauts. In addition, she mentions that low gravity condition leads to low bone density and low muscle mass. She then says that even the astronauts who pass a short time mission in the space face these problems. Therefore, long time missions will be worse.
Second, the article claims that the asteroids contains mines of valueable metals. This will be attractive for sponsors and provides sufficient budgets. However, the lecturer dismisses this idea and sates that the a high amount of cost is needed to support the colonies, provide essential pieces of equipment, and transport the metals to Earth. Adittionally, She asserts that the increase of supply will lead to deacrease in the price of valueable metals.
Finally, the reading asserts that it is easy to reach the asteroids due to their special orbits. Conversely, the professor brings the fact that although it easy to reach the asteroids, its is not easy to return to Earth. She then states that the orbits of the asteroids are very unusual. In some part of their orbits, they even go further than Mars. Therefore, it would not be practical for humans in the mentioned colonies to come back.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...urer dismisses this idea and sates that the a high amount of cost is needed to suppor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, however, second, so, then, therefore, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 288.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96527777778 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55977911856 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517361111111 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3492288224 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1176470588 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.