TPO 33 integrated
The reading passage talks about the purpose of using carved stone balls, while the lecturer holds a different point of view. To begin with, the author begins by stating that people used those balls for their hunting or fighting. It is mentioned that a plethora of balls was found on the holes and it was easy to swing or throw grasping at the end of the cord. In contrast, the professor refutes this statement by contending that the balls were vulnerable to break or crack. He claims that folks preserved it in a good way.
Secondly. the writer points out that carved stone balls were very effective to measure as well as to weigh because of their uniform size. The article notes that the balls were used to calculate any grain or food and it has unique characters like interchangeable. However, the lecturer rejects these challenges by explaining that the balls were made of different sorts of stone. He believes that though they were the same size, they possess different weights. As they were different densities.
Finally, the text says that people used those balls for their social status. This evidence is supported by that many stone balls have prodigious designs. The speaker, nonetheless, disagrees with this by mentioning that the designs covered by balls were very simple. He suggests that people did not decorate their graves by the stone balls as well as any scientist t do not find any graves which is built with stone balls.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...preserved it in a good way. Secondly. the writer points out that carved stone bal...
^^^
Line 2, column 460, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e size, they possess different weights. As they were different densities. Finall...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, in contrast, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 1977.66487455 60% => OK
No of words: 248.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82258064516 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4246045195 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560483870968 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 618.680645161 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7675797964 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4285714286 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.