it is better to learn from those at your own level like students or people at higher level like teachers
From a general standpoint finding a sufficient trend for learning is very important. As a matter of fact, these materials that we have chosen to learn from them will definitely determine the quality and quantity of our knowledge. While some people hold the view that learning from the persons who has the right level of you is better, I am personally inclined to believe that well-graduated people are the best source of learning. In the following, I will aptly pinpoint the most outstanding reasons to advocate my viewpoint.
The first reason leading credence to my argument is that choosing higher level people to learn from will eliminate the fear of unintentional mistakes. Needless to say that educated people are more reliable than lower level ones and we can trust them more because they have more knowledge. A personal experience of more may provide sufficient proof for my claim. In fact, when I was student I used to ask my problems pertinent to my course from one of my friends. Actually, because she did not have more information than me, she guided me in the wrong way and it caused a lot of obstacles for me. In contrary, If I had asked help from our professor I would carry out my research in the right way and much easier.
Secondly, people who are educated more than us have more experiences and they would share them with us. Hence, we are not required to examine many wrong paths toward our purpose because we already have used their experience and know the possible outcome. Moreover, these ready to use and handy experiences offers you the opportunity to save more time and sometimes more money. Take my sister for example, she wanted to conduct research on how the natural light can affect animals. There for, she started to prepare a research plan in order to list her to do tasks. When my father checked her plan he advised her not to use the laboratory that she had chosen. Fortunately, he had carried out research in that lab and was aware of the inadequate tools there. As you can see a higher level person's experiences can facilitate our route through our goals.
In conclusion, bearing the points and examples in my mind, I am of the opinion that we can learn more material from a person with higher knowledge person like a teacher. This is because not only are they more reliable and it's more relieving to trust them, but also they have more experiences than what a co level or classmate has and by using them you don't need to try a plenty of irrelevant and useless solutions that many of them would not indeed work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 566, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... plan in order to list her to do tasks. When my father checked her plan he advised h...
^^^^
Line 9, column 758, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as aware of the inadequate tools there. As you can see a higher level persons expe...
^^
Line 13, column 353, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... or classmate has and by using them you dont need to try a plenty of irrelevant and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67477876106 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54410542118 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513274336283 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1524661881 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.65 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146718816605 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466921593239 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598442816054 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105461682068 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459466395975 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.