many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
From a general point of view, student stratum of the society are considered as one of the most noticeable part, owing to the fact that they are the future citizens of the country and the societies' future thrive contributes to them. In this vein, the quality of their education is controversial and often provokes many discussions. Some people keep endorsing the claim that the same mark should be assigned to the whole members of a class group who work on a project whereas others dismiss this. Personally, it is my firm conviction that teachers should assign different grade for students in a group. In what follows, I aptly elucidate the rationale my perspective is based on.
To commerce, it is crystal clear that it seems unfair to who are industrious that all students get the same mark, although they work on the same project. To put it in a vivid picture, all members in a group does not particularly put the same effort on the project and some students are not tempted to work on the project, and may choose to work less. On the other hand, some others are intrinsically less smart and agile than others and present a different level of success in the same material. Therefore, each one should be graded based on oneself effort and knowledge that have endowed to the project. My experience during the freshman is a compelling example of this notion. When I was student, we were inflicted to work in groups made up of 5 students on an urban space analyzing project. Although it was very important to me to work hard on my assigned part and learn as much as I can beside earning a good grade, however, my classmates were on the opposite side. They did not carry out their duties well which lead to the failure of the project and end up with the worst grade for all of us regardless of our separate responsibilities. Had the professor assigned a grade based on the effort that each student had put on the project, my overall grade would have been significantly better.
The second pivotal reason that bears in mind is that, this grading system will discourage diligent students from being the best version of themselves. In other words, the student knows that due to other's default and the overall project yields in awful ramification, the teacher will not assign a good grade for them. Being aware of this rule, the pupil will be discouraged from accomplishing their task well. As a matter of fact, just one of the member's thrive and endeavor does not come in to account and other's inaction is effective. Considering my aforementioned example, I lost my interest in keeping working when I knew that their laziness affect the overall grade for us.
To put it in a nutshell, students should be assigned different grades from the others working in the same project. This is because not only it is unfair to them, but also it will discourage them from presenting whole their abilities and skills as they are aware of the adverse effect of other's incompetent performance.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, as a matter of fact, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2454.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 522.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70114942529 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6550480142 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477011494253 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 765.0 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.253653724 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296827111269 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944944871103 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855444861752 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183350995867 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875485074959 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.