No one can deny that there ar both positive and negative aspects of doing assignments in groups instead of individuals. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely select making projects or homeworks for each student alone to evaluate each student fairly. It is my firm belief that working in groups and give all students the same mark has several cons for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subdequent paragraphs.
To begin with, working in a group can achieve numerous advantages for the students like give each one separate task which make the mission easier, but without giving all the students the same grade because not all students did the same effort. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. Five years ago, when I was at the university, a professor gave the students an asignment and he decided to make a group consist of five students to finish the mission. However, we started our work on our project, and we gave each student some tasks to be fair for all. Undoubtedly, not all students have the same mind and can not make the same effort to achieve progress in the project. Consequently, after submiting the project, the professor started to evaluate each student alone based on his work, so not all of my colleague had the same score which is made everyone sufficient. If I had worked again in the project, I would have said to the professor to make it individual task.
Secondly, students who depend on other students to complete their works will have a terrible results in their work in the future. Drawing from my own experience. Some projects in my university have an equal grade for all students just by put his name in the group. Unfortunately, many students utilize this point and took many points without tired. Nowadays, Im working in a corporation with my friend who did this thing in the university, so his performance in the work is low, but my performance is high because I did all the projects by myself.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that it is a wrong method to evaluate students with the same grade by involving in the same group. This is because not all students providing the same effort and by this way students who did not make any potential can not present any advance in their practical work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'result'?
Suggestion: result
...mplete their works will have a terrible results in their work in the future. Drawing fr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ok many points without tired. Nowadays, Im working in a corporation with my friend...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67233009709 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60998408417 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473300970874 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6630166715 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.235294118 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2352941176 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331482782719 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119096420441 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790147946367 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227045490675 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230059837456 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.