It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends.
A friend is someone who sticks with you through thick and thin. Someone whom you can rely on for anything and reveal your darkest secrets. Personally, I believe that keeping older friends is more important than making new friends. I feel this way for 2 reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, old friends have been with you for a long time. They are those people with whom you grew up and because of this, they can understand you better. The friendship established in childhood is artless as it is not driven by any kind purpose behind it. Because of these bonds made in childhood are unbreakable. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Even when I have moved thousands of miles away from my hometown, I am still in contact with my school friends. We still keep in touch and even know when I am in serious need of advice I seek their help. The friends I have in my workplace are fun to talk to but, as soon as you need a favor from them they vanish leaving you helpless.
Secondly, old friends know your strength and weakness better. New friendship takes time to develop as each partner is not aware of the likes and dislikes of others, compared to this we are already past this and they know how you will behave in a certain situation. Hence, an old friend can give a clear picture of what is good and bad for you. For instance, when I was in high school and was starting to apply for colleges, I was keen to apply for medical just because my parents wanted me to become a doctor, however, it was my best friend who made me realize that this dream is not my own and I will have to live with this decision for the rest of my life. It was only because of him I was able to change my mind and pursue something which I was truly interested in.
In conclusion, an old friend is definitely more important than a new friend because of the aforementioned points. As the old adage says "Old is gold", we should do everything in our power to protect our relationship with old friends as those friends last life time.
- Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature's Way franchises tend to be most profitable in 77
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss the e 58
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss 75
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. 3
- LOR 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t driven by any kind purpose behind it. Because of these bonds made in childhood are un...
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
... with old friends as those friends last life time.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37142857143 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43375930365 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516883116883 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0897346423 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5789473684 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271954008152 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984376192177 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156907519119 0.0737576698707 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203883287585 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126484287233 0.0645574589148 196% => OK
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 58.1214874552 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 10.9000537634 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.