There are different opinion on whether people should follow the news preseneted by people with whom their view point are aligned or those posess different beliefs from them. Even though some people think watching or reading news that are presented by people who have opposite views from them give rises to anger and bad feelings, I believe otherwise, maintaining that advantages of listening to people with different point of view outweigh its drawbacks. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.
Without a doubt, the most consequential reason corroborating my stance on this subject is that people political, religonal, or social penchants are usually not quite objective. They have some biased, most of which are irrational, toward their beliefs. These tenets and conviction might have root in their family or the environment they have been raised. Watching news that are offered by the people with different perspective from what they have, help to think more objectively and see situations from different perspective. Consequently, they have a chance to amend their views on some issues. Therefore, this reason manifests the importance of watching news rendered by people with different conviction.
Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is that listening to what people with disimilar beliefs, even utterly conflicting views, say, is most of the time so instructive and help people to broaden their knowledge. In this way people get the chance to pay attention to more details and become aware of other people's notions. For instance, in my country there are two mian political group. The first group believes that religon should be implemented in politics, and religon and politics are not seperable. On the ther hand, the second group do not comply with this notion. Usually, they debate with each other and some of their debates are broadcasted on TV. Personally, I agree with the second group but most of time I lsiten more meticulously to delegate of the first group. If did not pay attention to the first group, I would not have the knowledge I have today. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that lsitening to people holding conflicting views from ours is crucial and beneficial.
To make a long story short, many people are in favor of listening to news that are presented by those who hold the same view point as they have. Nonetheless, the foregoing points lead us to conclude that listening to opposite group is more important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...my country there are two mian political group. The first group believes that religon ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12235294118 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69912198975 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505882352941 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8877922611 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.85 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246305519328 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765706011431 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923183691909 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17084892077 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848328602966 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.