It is more important for universities to invest in infrastructure and physical plant than to invest in keeping the faculty satisfied.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Sometimes universities get a funding from the government, and how to use the money becomes a controversial question. Some people advocate to use the money to build new infrastructure and physical plant. Others think it is better to invest in keeping the faculty satisfied. Personally, I prefer the first answer. I feel this way for the following reasons.
To begin with, the most improtant goal for an university is to educate great students. For this reason, I think students is the first group of people should be satisfied in the university. Good infracture such as a library or high-end lab equipments satisfies intelligent students' greed of learning and make students endeavor to study into a specific field. The job market is competitive, so students will like to learn as more skills as possible at scholl. By doing so, they are prone to find a better job. And the university is benited, too. If a student have a better job and earn a lot of money, he/she may donate money to back to the school. It becomes a positive cycle between students and schools.
Second, best infracture attracts best students. Therefore, the ranking of a school increases. In the end, more and more studenets would like to apply to the school. The school can get more tuition from students. And since the most intelligent students are in the school, they help publish high quality of paper which will wins more funding from the government. So, it is again a positive cycle between students and schools.
Last but the most important, the faculty in the university can use the new infracture, too. As a result, the welfare of the faculty is also satisfied. Take the librarian works in my university for example, thanks to him, his son can go inside the new library and borrow some books. And he is happy because he does not have to worry that his son may lie about hanging out all night with friends instead of studying.
In conclusion, to be benifit of all the members in a university, I think it is more important for universities to invest in infracture and physical plant rather than to invest in keeping the faculty satisfied.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 44, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...begin with, the most improtant goal for an university is to educate great students...
^^
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...nd lab equipments satisfies intelligent students greed of learning and make students end...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'attracts the best'.
Suggestion: attracts the best
...s and schools. Second, best infracture attracts best students. Therefore, the ranking of a s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, i feel, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76839237057 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73509497641 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512261580381 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2834736856 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.9166666667 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2916666667 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285664786249 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721302585354 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996736563755 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191847536803 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155080478043 0.0645574589148 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.