It’s difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn. Agree or disagree?
By and large, there are certain considerations or factors which everyone can take into account to investigate and examine the teachers’ feature for achievement in his or her career. Some teachers think that should teach rigorous because students can easily get the class out of control, but some teachers try to make friend with students to be well-liked. As a whole can states that few teachers are in that faith which should be not only popular but also effective. Some people are in the conviction that it is not a necessity for teachers to have both mentioned skills simultaneously and think these cannot the causes of their future attainment. Their supposition is at odds with the conception of some others belonging to another side embracing the view that many accomplished teachers in the world necessity have both popular and effective skills. I am of the latter opinion, supporting that because the students both enjoy learning and don’t bored from classes. Also, In support of this argument, we should note that each skill should be divided equally. However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it provides little credible support for our conclusion.
The first salient aspect to be introduced is that the students make the enjoyment for learning. When the teachers have popularity and effectively features simultaneously, the students are careful about the teachers’ word. Therefore, they interested in learning. For example, my teacher uses both skills in his classes, and when he started to teach all the students to pay attention to his lessons and like to continue for a long time. Even we are doing our homework quickly and meticulous.
Another equally noteworthy point corroborating my stance is that the classes are not boring for the students. Undoubtedly, when classes are not boring the students become more active and try to understand the lessons carefully and even they don’t become tired. These points state that each teacher which want to have successful students must have popularity and effectiveness. For instance, when I was 15 years old, usually don’t like to take place in the school’s classes because my classes make me tired. Until I see my physics teacher, he was a very polite and exacting person. I attempt to participate in all the physics’ classes because his class makes me happy and fresh.
In order to fully evaluate this argument, we need to have a significant amount of additional evidence before accepting or refusing it completely. The piece of evidence we need to know more, then analyze, are that popularity and effectively necessity must divide into two equal sections. I think if each skill catch more attendance can influence the students’ behavior upon the class and teacher. For instance, if the amount of teacher’s popularity or effectively exceed, the student makes bored or don’t like to participate in the class etc.
From what was already mentioned, considering the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that it is more rational to the cause of the teachers should have popularity and effectively aspects in their classes. I have several reasons for holding this view, so since not only learning becomes enjoyable, but also the classes don’t boring. However, one should pay attention to the fact that these conditions divide equally. As a matter of fact, some other reasons can be invoked to back up my perspective, but let us suffice to this.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... like to participate in the class etc. From what was already mentioned, conside...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, as a matter of fact, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2922.0 1977.66487455 148% => OK
No of words: 561.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20855614973 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91945634201 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477718360071 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 926.1 618.680645161 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8613230843 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7037037037 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339866184834 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945736641907 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757918191194 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210284897119 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067600481756 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.