It’s difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn. Agree or disagree?

Being a teacher that both popular and effective to help students learning seems difficult since a teacher cannot concentrate to balance the relationship between the two. However, these two things contact closely with each other, so based on my own experience and personality, do well in these two things is easy to every teacher if they are endeavor to try the following things.

First of all, undoubtedly, humorous is one of the most important aspects for teachers. Since students are all under too much pressure, a humorous teacher will attract their attention and stimulate their interests in classes. Fully mobilizing their initiatives is conductive to them acquire more knowledge. For example, if classes are all the same styles, and teachers only teach contents from books, students will feel bored and fall asleep. Otherwise, humorous classes make students laugh, ease their pressure, and can also study at the same time. Whatever the conditions or the situation we are stated, a person with humorous characteristic enjoys great popularity. Hence, in order to make teachers both achievements in students’ daily and study life, being humorous is one way.

Further lending credence to my position is that for teachers, the more careful to students, the more popular they can have, and the better grades students can receive. This is because caring students not only can protect them form trouble, it can also make them love this teacher. We cannot deny that students always behavior well in the class taught by the teacher they loved, so they focus on the class and study effectively. For instance, my high school math teacher treated every student well and cared more about us. Even if I left high school, when she heard about my sad condition, she still called for me and encouraged me. Also, my math grade is the highest in my College Entrance Examination. Thus, with better care, clearly, their studying efficiency can be largely promoted as well.

What is more, no one can deny the fact that in the contemporary society, the teacher boards range of knowledge can lead a good grades of students. If the teacher is erudite, it will stimulate students’ interests to this subject. Like my atmospheric science teacher, he shows great aspects knowledge, not only science major like physics or mathematics, but also politics and philosophy. His lessons have such attractive charm that made me attach importance to them. In addition, for us, he taught specially software to draw weather pictures, instead of the traditional way. And every class, I want to try my best to learn more, so my grades are potentially improved.

Based on the analysis above, we can hardly ignore the important aspects on how to be a popular teacher and also help students study effectively. Therefore, humorous, care and range of knowledge are much more essential for teachers.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...y life, being humorous is one way. Further lending credence to my position is that...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 287, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'aspects'' or 'aspect's'?
Suggestion: aspects'; aspect's
...spheric science teacher, he shows great aspects knowledge, not only science major like ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, all the same, first of all, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2418.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13375796178 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70804942229 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537154989384 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3213723097 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294151634562 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822132411273 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088994570803 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172751025212 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471977079066 0.0645574589148 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.