Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In today's hectic life it is an astonishing fact that people from all walks of life differ greatly in their attitudes towards this phenomenon. We find that some people hold the great idea that learning from past has a lot of advantages for living now, on the other hand, others may oppose the idea. From my perspective it is better to choose former. So, as Hollywood celebrities say: "Let's cut the chase".

Talking the proposed subject into account the reason which may shed some light on my point is that we can diminish our faults by learning from past. It goes without saying that people can read the book that contains past people life and get their experiences easily. For example, when I was in university, I read a book about former university people. That book contains a lot of information about effective study techniques. I used these techniques in order to increase my grades in university. Furthermore, in the end of the semester my grades were very high. As a corollary, we can significantly increase our mistakes by learning from past.

Another rationale about why I take negative idea about the first perspective in the introduction paragraph is that history is sometimes be learning for just for know ancient people. Some people's best free time activity is reading a book about past book. For instance, I found a relic book in my library which is about people's life in 2001. It is very interesting to read because now we are in 2018. Book states in 2001 people would going to build time machine. Besides, that old book gives information about the perspective of ancient people which is very unique. All in all, one of the crucial value of learning about past is it can be very fun.

Nevertheless, the two paragraphs in the body should not be overgeneralized. Just as an old adage goes: "a coin has two sides", those who take the other sides are partially reasonable every once in a while. That is sometimes there might be a situation in which people tend to study study future without any stress about what had been in the past. In fact, life is too short to learn from past.

To put in a nutshell in light of previously discussed reasons of my viewpoint who believe learning from past is accepted occasionally, though the situation like forgetting the background is fairly rare and that should not be accepted as general rule. Indeed, reducing our faults and for fun is are prime factors to my propensity for choosing learn from past. If I could have chance to learn anything from past, I do not have a bit of hesitation to accept it.

Votes
Average: 4.4 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... paragraph is that history is sometimes be learning for just for know ancient peop...
^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
... 2018. Book states in 2001 people would going to build time machine. Besides, that ol...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 552, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
... perspective of ancient people which is very unique. All in all, one of the crucial value o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: study
... be a situation in which people tend to study study future without any stress about what ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 343, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to learn'
Suggestion: to learn
...e factors to my propensity for choosing learn from past. If I could have chance to le...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, in fact, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72949002217 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67772855885 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507760532151 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8423056649 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.32 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.04 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182429582327 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530836906538 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421662552941 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105513446073 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030113952765 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.