Many cities suffer from traffic-related problems. What problems does traffic cause in cities and what are the possible solutions?
Nowadays, more jobs and more facilities are available in urban areas. It causes people to immigrate to cities and turns them as a densely populated area. These densities cause some major traffic problems in such cities. Traffic jams have some negative effects on people who are living in those big cities and the environment. So, some solutions should be considered to overcome the problems. In this essay traffic problems and some solutions that can be helpful will be discussed.
In big cities, air pollution and traffic jams are significant problems which are mainly caused by cars and traffic-related problems. Contamination in big cities is an important factor which has increased health problems. Studies have shown that in metropolises, people have struggled with some health problems such as lung cancer and heart attacks more than any other cities. Without a doubt, those kinds of problems are mainly related to environmental pollution. For example, in Tehran the capital of Iran, where the population is more than ten billion! People are faced a lot of serious health problems by air pollution. Some senior citizens who have a critical respiratory disease in such cities are forced by their family to immigrate to other small cities or even rural areas in order to have a longer life. Furthermore, more traffic jams can create stress in people’s live. People have to wake up early and leave their home two or three hours sooner to go to work because of the rush hours at morning. As a result, they have less time for sleeping which can make their life stressful. So, traffics not only can damage to the environment but also has a crucial role in people’s lifestyle and their health.
On the other hand, some solutions should be considered to avoid problems. Governments and people both should be responsible for these kinds of issues. First of all, Governments can enact rules for preventing cars using and encouraging people to use public transportation. For instance, road tax should be increased, and public transport fares should be decreased they should be as low as possible. Moreover, states can assign more budgets and money to cars manufactures for building cars which are environmentally friendly. Electric engine cars can be a good alternative to fossil fuel cars which have more air pollution. Secondly, individuals in a society should take care of traffic issue and its problems. It is better that people use their cars in a necessary situation and avoid using cars when it is unnecessary. Some young people prefer to use their cars for hanging on with their friends or get some short distances which cause traffic jams. Instead of using cars for such unnecessary purpose they can use other ways such as subway or bicycle which not only is healthier but also is cost-efficient. Reducing the number of vehicles allowed into cities and people’s self-awareness about their roles and responsibilities in a society can decrease the level of air pollution and other related problems dramatically.
In conclusion, living in big cities are stressful, and traffic jam is a big problem, but there are some solutions to overcome. Problems like air pollution and traffic jams are undeniable is such cities however governments and people can manage their society in order to have less traffic.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2779.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 545.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09908256881 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84076402412 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462385321101 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 870.3 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1017475046 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8275862069 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7931034483 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89655172414 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205930766845 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073759012943 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724358020111 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18553123197 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735436970241 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.