Many people may work at home with modern technology. Some people claim that it benefits only workers, but not employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, people are attended to do their work at home using modern technology. Although some of the employers have the negative opinion about this situation, I think this form is more beneficial rather than working in specific place. That is due to decreasing the cost of workers’ transportation, increasing the speed of working and becoming more accurate and trustable work.
As you know, the cost of everyday transportation of workers is high; hence, you are needed a solution for decrease this amount. To put it differently, when employees must spend their money, their time and etc. for go and come to their home, you are needed a solution to cut this situation. One of the best solutions is, picking up the way of the home using modern technology in the home. This method is called telecommuting. For example, when I was a student at a university, I worked for a company as a typist. I was spending most of my time and money for transport between our home and the place that the company was located; thus, I decided to stay at home and did my functions.
With the advancement and developing of technology, all of us could do our work fast more than past. Otherwise stated, although people have a strong mind, sometimes the human brain is not capable of a great amount of data calculation, so technology help to humans improves their ability and speed. As an example, when you are working as an economic manager in a company, you need to calculate a great space of economic numbers. Without a strong computer, you couldn’t do that properly and fast.
Last but not least, usually companies compete for achieving to more customers, so they must present a high quality work for them. This matter does not occur unless improving their accuracy. Alternatively stated, people are attended to the company with trustable services; therefore, the company must use equipment to provide this need. For instance, I usually assign our companies' calculation to companies with high technology means.
As outlined above, I think that it is a wrong attitude about the benefits of telecommuting work. That is because of both of employers and worker could be utilized, improve their accuracy and their speed. That have benefits for all of them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... home using modern technology. Although some of the employers have the negative opinion abo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...yees must spend their money, their time and etc. for go and come to their home, you are ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
... could do our work fast more than past. Otherwise stated, although people have a strong m...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91842105263 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82755902285 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.916429402 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0952380952 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198015955601 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641051360087 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691247266897 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114591606703 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054358049989 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.