Many people value long-lasting friendships. Which ONE of the following qualities do you think Is most Important for determining whether a friendship between two people will last a long time? Why?
－They always help each other in a crisis or when something goes wrong.
－They have similar interests and similar views on important topics.
－They trust each other completely.
Friendships are vital to everyone, so many people nowadays want to do their best to make relationships last longer. Some people feel that helping each other is very important to the continuity of a friendship. yet others believe that only people with common interests can build lasting friendships. In my opinion, I maintain that mutual trust is the most central factor in determining the longevity of a friendship. My reasons and examples are discussed in more detail below.
First of all, the most important reason to support my view is that only when friends have the most basic trust in each other are we less likely to have frequent misunderstandings and thus more likely to maintain relationships for a long time. On the contrary, if friends do not trust each other, chances are high for us to misunderstand each other over trivial things, thus causing a rift in our friendship. I believe relevant examples are not uncommon in our lives Ay uncle had a very good friend, and they usually studied stocks together. Every time my uncle found any company worth investing in, he would recommend it to his friend. However here was a time when my uncle was particularly busy, so he didn't tell his friend about the latest change in his stock portfolio in time. Also, the stock market was performing well during hat time and my uncle made a lot of money. When his friend found out about this, he was very frustrated because he felt that my uncle had cheated him. He therefore thought that my uncle did not want to help his friends around him to become rich together. Despite my uncle best efforts to explain to him, he didn't have any trust in my uncle's words, so their friendship soon came to an end, My uncle's story shows that friendships can hardly last if there is no basic trust between friends.
On the other hand, I don't think common interest is the most important thing in a friendship. It is not hard to find that there are numerous close friends who do not share many hobbies, and there are plenty of people who like to build relationships with people having different hobbies from themselves because they feel that this can broaden their horizons and make their lives more colorful. There are even some individuals who believe that if their friends have the same hobbies as they do, then it's boring to stay together all the time. Furthermore disagree that always being able to help each other is an important factor in determining whether a friendship will last. The reason behind this is also very simple. Nowadays, the majority of people in this society are under tremendous pressure, so each of us needs to do our best to earn a living every day. Even so, we may only barely break even. Under such circumstances, it is difficult for us to always lend a helping hand when our friends are in trouble There may well be situations where even if we know a friend is entangled in a tough situation, it is difficult for us to offer any practical help. When this happens, what determines whether the friendship will continue or not is whether there is enough trust between each other, as I said in the previous paragraph
In conclusion, based on the reasons and examples I mentioned above, I insist that if we want to build long-lasting friendships with others, mutual trust is indispensable
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Yet
...tant to the continuity of a friendship. yet others believe that only people with co...
^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...n, he would recommend it to his friend. However here was a time when my uncle was parti...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 704, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...n my uncle was particularly busy, so he didnt tell his friend about the latest change...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1098, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'uncle the best'.
Suggestion: uncle the best
...him to become rich together. Despite my uncle best efforts to explain to him, he didnt hav...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1139, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ncle best efforts to explain to him, he didnt have any trust in my uncles words, so t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...etween friends. On the other hand, I dont think common interest is the most impor...
^^^^
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...s boring to stay together all the time. Furthermore disagree that always being able to help...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, even so, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2725.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 579.0 407.700716846 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70639032815 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90534594407 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60314900651 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464594127807 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 829.8 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.9183810284 48.9658058833 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.47826087 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1739130435 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13043478261 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300320591459 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950542004932 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855341495024 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205401107627 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798360787353 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.