A controversial debate which is raised about the role of modern transportation in our lives. Some people hold the view that modern transportation encourages people to own more cars thus contributes to more road traffics. However, some others may have an opposing view and feel that modern technology creates. environment-friendly vehicles which save our world. From my vantage view, I concur with the later groups and feel that modern transportation has made our world a better place because less carbon dioxide is emitted into the air.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that modern transportation may save the environment. Most of the previously developed cars were relying on gas as a source of energy to operate vehicles. However, with the latest introduction of electric cars, people are able to drive these cars without the need for fuel. These vehicles can save the environment from the green gas effect. A vivid example which shed light on what was elaborated above is Tesla cars. Such cars are called zero emission cars, which means that they do not release any traces of carbon dioxide into the air. Thus, they keep the air clean.
The second point which deserves some words here is that modern transportation vehicles do not need fuel to operate. Thus, they can save us money. For instance, a car can be plugged into electricity at night and be ready to drive during the day. W Saving fuel. Without the need for fuel, a car may save money., A regular car needs 4 gallons of fuel to cross 200 miles. which cost around $20. However, with electricity operated vehicles, this money could be saved.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. There is another subtle point to be mentioned. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible study published in the Amecian car magazine Journal. The study shows that governments significantly encourages people to operate electric cars because of two reasons. The first reason is the tax cuts which allows people to save money and the second reason is the possibility of driving those cars on pool lanes which are less crowded
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned points, one soon realizes the importance of modern transportation technology in our lives. Such technology may not only saves us money, but also creates a clean environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Environment-friendly
...nd feel that modern technology creates. environment-friendly vehicles which save our world. From my ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to fuel'?
Suggestion: to fuel
...ern transportation vehicles do not need fuel to operate. Thus, they can save us mone...
^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...s 4 gallons of fuel to cross 200 miles. which cost around 0. However, with electricit...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s 4 gallons of fuel to cross 200 miles. which cost around 0. However, with electricit...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 385, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e electric cars because of two reasons. The first reason is the tax cuts which allo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02512562814 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8733350205 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527638190955 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.1986013815 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.92 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140876033781 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376195973648 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691527269342 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855070275975 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995513227354 0.0645574589148 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.