A controversy is often raised about the ways to improve the quality of education. Some groups of people hold the view that universities should spend money on labs and libraries. However, some others hold a different view and fell that spending these money to increase professor's wages would bring better results. From my vantage point, I concur with the latter groups for different reasons that I address in my essay.
The first exquisite reason to be mentioned is that paying more money to professors make them more productive. Money provides a motive for professors to excel in there work. Everybody can understand what a fierce conversation author Susan scott describes as the ground truth which is that Without enough money professors can hardly make a living. As a result, they become demotivated, helpless, and frustrated. This would ultimately leads to a decline in the quality of education students receive. A vivid example which illustrate my view point is the quality or education I received during my education at the university. Because of the high wages professors earn, the quality of education was of utmost standard
However, there are other benefits of increasing professors wages. No one person, including universities has all the answers, especially in today's complex teaching environment, but the one thing that everybody agrees on is that today, there is a continuous decline in the number of professors who join universities. Highly caliber professors tend to prefer private companies instead of university because they are capable of paying higher wages. Therefore, not only universities would lose such talent, but also students and the community.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available for me to hold this believe. In fact, there is another subtle reason. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible results of a study that was published in the American education Journal which showed that universities paying higher professor's wages were able to score better in the top five hundred universities. This study was conducted on 120 universities inorder to prevent any bias
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that valuable professors should be rewarded for the all their hard work. This will eventually lead to the raise of a new innovative generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...a different view and fell that spending these money to increase professors wages would brin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
..., and frustrated. This would ultimately leads to a decline in the quality of educatio...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty of education was of utmost standard However, there are other benefits of inc...
^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...y reasons available for me to hold this believe. In fact, there is another subtle reaso...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 190, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
... will eventually lead to the raise of a new innovative generation.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30809399478 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93218579391 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548302872063 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7379267962 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1578947368 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47368421053 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153886961632 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488960033455 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357522173657 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083104324248 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458694042012 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.