Movies and television programs should present stories in which good people are rewarded and bad people are punished. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The 20th and 21st centuries are characterized by all the momentous changes which have been made in humans' lives. Perhaps the most important milestone of these two centuries is the advent of sophisticated technologies, which influence people's lives enormously. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether movies and television programs should rely on positive and negative aspects of people hallmarks. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that although positive and negative behaviors of people play a significant role, movies and TV should cover informative and helpful program regarding humans' lives. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issue in this framework.
To commence with, in today's hectic city of life, technologies have penetrated every single facet of our lives, in which TV is one of the manifestations of the technological advancement. Generally phrased, TV nowadays provides a wide range of programs about different subjects. But these programs should be helpful and informative for human beings. As a palpable example, knowing which people should be rewarded or punished might not be effective in human lives owing to the fact that there are several tasks human beings need to learn. In fact, TV could provide an opportunity for individuals and teach them through programs on how to take the responsibility for their behaviors and not to do something wrong. To elucidate more on this issue, TV and movies could play a consequential role in the treatment of people in any given society. So, not only can individuals learn how to behave but also can learn how to become a self-sufficient and successful person in the long run.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance on this subject is that TV programs and movies can provide documentaries for people and help them enhance their knowledge. If we take a minute to ponder over it, vast majorities of people in the society suffer from the paucity of knowledge and information about various realms. For instance, a TV program or a movie can provide fertile ground for people to become familiar with the history of the nation where he/she lives. So, not only can history help people make a sound and a wise decision in their personal lives but also can support them not to do something wrong owing to the fact that our history is our teacher. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that there are majorities of programs that could be shown by TV, which are helpful and useful for the entire humanity. However, every coin has two sides. If TV programs or movies concentrate on people's hallmarks and represent their positive and negative characters, it allows people to recognize and identify human beings as easy as possible. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal perspective.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether movies and television programs should r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, regarding, so, as to, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2581.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0019379845 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82797229265 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496124031008 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 814.5 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6394266572 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.904761905 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231059441716 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069799614692 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549783385895 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128742204528 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771103953789 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.