Well, in my view, I would definitely disagree with the statement that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students because for the three following reasons.
First, some students may spend more time than other team members doing a project, of course, it is not fair all of the team members give the same grade. It causes students who spent more time on their projects are upset and don't tend to participate in the group. This issue provides an atmosphere that students will not probably participate in teamwork in their careers. as a result, they lose their chance to get the desired job because many companies care about teamwork, and except when hire employees, they should work together easily.
Second, Some student who spend less time doing work in teamwork and give the same grade with other team members, they will not probably do the task well in their lives because they almost will think can escape from solving challenges and other people will solve that. They also will become unreliable people and will not be able to organize their work. giving those people the same grade makes them to lazy at their work that seems they will not be successful.
Third, the concept of teamwork is learning how to do our tasks together, when some team member don't keep their promises and do not fulfill their work, they can't learn educational materials that is the purpose of their teamwork. they lose their chance to learn much knowledge, have experienced as well as they can't develop their skills.
Of course, they will face many problems in their future job, some companies evaluate each person individually in the team, people who don't keep their promises may face the risk of being fired.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ng a project, of course, it is not fair all of the team members give the same grade. It ca...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...re time on their projects are upset and dont tend to participate in the group. This ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...rticipate in teamwork in their careers. as a result, they lose their chance to get...
^^
Line 4, column 354, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Giving
...ill not be able to organize their work. giving those people the same grade makes them ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 96, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r tasks together, when some team member dont keep their promises and do not fulfill ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 157, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ses and do not fulfill their work, they cant learn educational materials that is the...
^^^^
Line 6, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... that is the purpose of their teamwork. they lose their chance to learn much knowled...
^^^^
Line 6, column 310, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ledge, have experienced as well as they cant develop their skills. Of course, they...
^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...on individually in the team, people who dont keep their promises may face the risk o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, may, second, so, third, well, of course, as a result, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79933110368 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22682205833 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531772575251 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1141104218 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.454545455 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21900112015 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102863889436 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103837395137 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146545834403 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116652574819 0.0645574589148 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 86.8835125448 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.