During the academic life, people encounter many projects that should be done in a group manner. There is a debate over the grading policy of group projects. While many argue that all members of a group should receive the same grade, some individuals, including me, think that this is a wrong idea. I believe that giving the same score to all participants causes two problems, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, knowing that he is not the only one responsible for a task, one may not put all of his effort into the job. It is highly probable that some members of a group do not try for a group project as hard as they would for solitary ones. These people know that if they do not discharge their duties, other people in the group who are more responsible will work more to compensate for that. One way to prevent this attitude is to score individuals based on their contribution to the project. In this way, teachers foster the students to take their tasks seriously.
Secondly, people's contribution to a project is almost never equal, which means it would not be fair to give everyone the same mark. In most groups, some people have more impact on the project than others. Thus, giving them the same score is unfair and may result in losing motivation for better students. I think that one way to prevent this problem is by considering different factors for grading. For example, a teacher can calculate the score of each student based on their contribution to the work and the results of the whole team. This way, the teacher is able to contemplate both solitary and group activities of individuals.
To sum up, I am of the opinion that people in groups should not be given the same mark. This is because some lazy and ill-will students may not try sufficiently, believing others will carry out their tasks, and it is unfair to give the stronger students, who worked hard for the project, the same grade as the weaker ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a group manner" with adverb for "group"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...unter many projects that should be done in a group manner. There is a debate over the grading pol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, i think, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61891117479 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45927077446 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501432664756 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2652236141 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8235294118 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343084226337 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113038836793 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742000691192 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23088633779 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703512193125 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.