Students are building blocks of every society and have a crucial role in developing communities; as a result, policymakers do their best to provide a well-rounded education for them. It is obvious that group work projects are an integral part of education; however, how to give group work project participants grades is controversial. Although many people believe that they all should receive the same mark, I have this notion that teachers should not give the same grade to all members of the group. I will discuss my compelling reasons in the following paragraphs.
First off, it is unfair as all members do not work the same and equally. In every group work project, there are some members who try harder than others and are enthusiastic about their studies. On the other hand, some students would not do anything since they know that if they do not work, others have to do their tasks as the entire project will not finish. Once, I had an arduous group project with a short deadline. One of my teammates was irresponsible, and she did not take things seriously. I had no choice, so I covered her since my final grade depended on her and that project. Ultimately, we got the same mark, and nobody cared about how responsible I was. I became overwhelmed, but could not do anything.
Another noteworthy reason is that students will become reluctant to try hard. Everybody wishes for fruitful results and huge achievements after working hard. The harder they try; the better grades they expect. Therefore, when they do not receive this appreciation, they become hopeless. Unfortunately, grades are significant avenues for teachers to show their appreciation to the students. Take my last example, for instance, had I known we would receive the exact marks, I would not have been trying so hard. I promised myself not to attempt hard in group work projects, and just let them go. For other projects, I did not do well; but, it was not that important because we all received the same marks, and there were not any competitions. I did not see any reasons to study or try hard.
In a nutshell, I believe that teachers should consider every attempt of each student in the group work projects; hence, they can give them various scores. Not only do students become more motivated to study, but also the grades will be fair enough to compare them easily.
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to70
- For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... as the entire project will not finish. Once, I had an arduous group project with a ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82222222222 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66654549336 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8399985558 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9130434783 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6086956522 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73913043478 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368282393243 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983258608416 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948497485587 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248608961214 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114638133735 0.0645574589148 178% => OK
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.