One of the controversial issues related to professors is that whether or not they must allow students to use the internet connected devices in classes
It goes without saying that in the cultural and educational aspects of individuals, professors play an important role. The teaching method and roles applied by them in universities' classes can lead students to flourish or languish according to how much they learn from. One of the controversial issues related to professors is that whether or not they must allow students to use the internet connected devices in classes. Even though many students are of the opinion that they must be admitted to use such a device, but, as one, strongly reject their idea for a bunch of reasons among which disrupting essence of the internet and disappearing of question and answer from classes are the most consequence ones.
To begin with, as we know, by galloping rate of developing in technology and function of the internet, always there are accessible some new online-games most of which are very tempting for the young people like students. Considering this along with accepting that most classes are boring in students' eyes, if students had accessibility to the internet, they would definitely prefer to play a game instead of listening to their professors' lecture. Additionally, these days' young people are really addicted to social networks, so it is one another option of the internet for students rather than focusing on classes. For instance, the lowest score I got in university was for my biology class. Our teacher was not at all a restricted person. In fact, we are free in his class to use our phones to connect to the internet. During the semester, I completely was playing my favorite game in his class. I honestly learn nothing in this biology class, though our professor was the famous one in his field. Now, I think it was so because of disrupting property of the internet during class.
Secondly, it is not to mention that by inventing technologies and internet most of the individuals, students are no exception, opt for solving their problem by searching through the internet not questioning from knowledgeable people. Regarding this approach, if professors take their students' using of the internet lightly, after a while their class will become with not questions and answers. Such a happening brings a lot of disadvantages for all listener in classes. It is crystal clear that some students in class are not able to think deeply or analyze matters immediately after teaching them. They almost can take benefits from their peers' questions in classes. Unfortunately, most of their classmates will look for their problem via the internet if they are allowed by professors. This big change carried by the internet can noticeably affect the level of most students' learning. On top of this, there is another problem caused by the internet accessibility in classes which is more harmful. It is likely for many of students that want to find the solution of their problem on the internet receive wrong one. A lot of things like misunderstanding, wrong online information and so forth to make such an outcome. Students will eventually finish their semester without grasping enough understanding of the issue which would undoubtedly obtain by asking question in classes.
In summary, with all this taken into account, I do believe that it is not reasonable that students are permitted to use their devices with the availability to connect to the internet in class. This permission not only makes them unfocused in classes but also causes them to achieve less useful comprehension.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...al issues related to professors is that whether or not they must allow students to use the int...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, honestly, if, look, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, as for, for instance, i think, in fact, in summary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 96.0 52.1666666667 184% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2920.0 1977.66487455 148% => OK
No of words: 576.0 407.700716846 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06944444444 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89897948557 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85013401244 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482638888889 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 897.3 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1990565002 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.307692308 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409728008642 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119146581342 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162334636825 0.0737576698707 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276885347241 0.150856017488 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131799205197 0.0645574589148 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.