solutions to get rid of dangerous for birds caused by glasses
The reading discusses that glass used as material building bring birds dangerous because they are not able to differentiate between glass and open air, so accordingly they are likely to fly through which can make them injured. The author of the reading provides three solutions to get rid of such an occurrence. On the other hand, the professor in the lecture has contradictory opinion with the author and denies all reasons presented in reading.
First and foremost, according to the author in the extract, one-way glass, those that are transparent just in one side, can solve such a problem happened for birds. Nonetheless, the speaker in the lecture offset this point by explaining a fact of one-way glass that is hidden by the author. He states that Such a glass act like a mirror that reflex sky, tree and so on, so accordingly this happening make birds confuse among the reflected object and the same real one. Subsequently, the professor declares that these glasses cannot prevent injuries caused by flying through glass too.
The author in the excerpt further asserts that colorful designed glasses also are a good way to hamper above-mentioned occurrence for birds. In contrast, the professor maintains that the uncolored hole between designs in glass will be identified as an open hole. When they fly around those glass, they maybe continue flying right through those holes. This consideration rebuts this point of the author.
The author of the extract lasting insists that man-made guiding magnetic field is another way to prevent birds from flying into glass. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this by giving some clarification about when birds use magnetic field as a navigation object. He says that birds use this their ability only during long distances, and in the short distances they use their eyes and brightness light to direct ways. He makes a result from his last discussion that magnetic field like other solution mentioned in reading is not useful and effective.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10703363914 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6249151348 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562691131498 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7925732881 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252658109243 0.272083759551 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759585545753 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559622540351 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142104481076 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494536643474 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.