Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations
Some people are sure that we hold a very bad way of life for our planet that will make lives of our children impossible; others are sure that our ancestors were doing it even worse. No matter what the truth is, I would agree with the first statement. What we are doing nowadays with the is usually disgusting, and not only regarding the environment! Let’s take a closer look at this problem to find out, what are we doing wrong right now that will have a negative impact on future generations.
To start with, needless to say, as it was already mentioned, we take all resources from our planet and leave nothing for further generations. To be more specific, for example, let’s discuss the way we make energy. There are three main types of building that produce energy: coal, water, and nuclear plants. But, unfortunately, the most widely used is the first one that makes the most pollution. As research shows, up to 80% of our energy is produced from coal or oil. If we keep the pace, in less than a few hundred years out planet will have no this resources left. It is awful! I am of conviction that we can get rid of such plants to use more environmentally-friendly types, such as nuclear ones. If everything goes as projected, this type of producing energy is the cleanest one: if we use the latest technology, the same piece fuel can be put in the reactor a lot of times, so we do not have to dig the planet for more. Consequently, the resources will be exhausting a lot later that in a hundred years.
As one more example of negative impact on further generations, let’s discuss the budgets of biggest countries in the world. I am sure, that all giants spend a lot less money on developing their children that on proving their “greatness” right now. For example, according to some estimates, up to 70% of Russian budget is spent for military purposes. It is awful! Why do we spend so much for wars, but less than 5% for healthcare and education summarized? That is a big problem of mankind nowadays: most of governments do not think of investing money into future, so this way of life will indisputably have a negative impact on our descendants.
So, to sum up, our current way of life will surely have a very negative impact on future generations. But we still can change the way things go: we just need to stop searching for easy profit. We have to invest money in developing more environmentally-friendly ways to produce goods, spend more money for educational and medical purposes instead of military. If we do so, the life of our descendants will be a lot easier and prosperous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... few hundred years out planet will have no this resources left. It is awful! I am ...
^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the biggest'.
Suggestion: of the biggest
... generations, let’s discuss the budgets of biggest countries in the world. I am sure, that...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the governments') or simply say ''most governments''.
Suggestion: most of the governments; most governments
...t is a big problem of mankind nowadays: most of governments do not think of investing money into fu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, look, regarding, so, still, for example, such as, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2141.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60430107527 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89873009142 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494623655914 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6114151885 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.952380952 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283202669384 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932838083428 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137654625866 0.0737576698707 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214432465332 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100737394478 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.