Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that today high rate of change in technology and society make a realistic prediction about potential jobs that can lead to a successful future impossible. I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that in the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
First and foremost, today governments' managers become helpless from regulating the number of job positions with the portion of graduated people. It is the serious problem of our today society which a lot of young people cannot find a job, because the population of academic educated people are so much higher than available careers. However, in the past, all students who enter universities were sure that they would be able to have an appropriate job and a happy life in the future.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that the occupation situation is even more severe for workers and people without academic education. In recent years, the high speed of development in science and technology leads to industries need lesser and lesser labors to powered their production. For example, in most factories, the old instruments are replacing with new ones which are completely automatics. Last year my uncle lost his job at a logging factory because they did not wants labors any more.
Finally, yet importantly, some rules make job conditions very uncertain for employees. For example, in the past, most of the people hired permanently by companies. Nonetheless, today most employment is temporary, and government rules' are mainly in favor of bosses rather workers. The head of companies is able to fired people without any difficulty, the circumstance that increases stress and anxiety for members.
On the basis of reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that in the past it was easier to identify which type of career lead to a successful life. Because today the number of applicants suppress the number of job positions, and employment rules are not fair for workers, and high tech technology is quickly changing industries.
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 76
- In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 76
- Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 78
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? 90
- TPO 49 INTEGRATED 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'want'
Suggestion: want
... a logging factory because they did not wants labors any more. Finally, yet impor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, for example, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09742120344 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80046641287 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575931232092 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6606405019 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332171307622 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106955790413 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188310503894 0.0737576698707 255% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199517235892 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190391810663 0.0645574589148 295% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.