By and large, in the modern society which, we face a lot of problems each day. There are a plethora of people who are in conviction that Problems can be solved through the help of family members or the individuals, while others take a radically different perspective and assert that the interfere of government is essential in order to solve the problems that one faces. To the extent that my opinion is concerned I accord with the second group. Among countless reasons that give adherence to my perspective, I will delve into the most important ones as follows.
Firstly, the structure of fundamental and important problems crave for interfere of a greater power such as government. The health and education related subjects for that matter cannot be easily defeated unless the authorities provide the appropriate bed for it. For instance, as I turned 7, I got liver problems. I spent something around 3 weeks in hospital and paid a small amount of money, since the authorities accepted that my parent were unable to afford my surgery. Expenses were tremendous and if it wasn't for the government I could have easily be dead in less than 3 days, as doctors claimed. I can still remember my mother's face when she attended the accounting department to pay the fee. Feared from what she was about to face, she asked the lady how much we had to pay. The nurse smiled, saying that the state has covered it all. You only have to pay for the food supplements. The agitation dwindled as she heard her and looked back at the nurse with a strong sense of gratitude.
Secondly, the capacity of an individual to surmount the problems or the family members to help, is limited. The ascending price of house for example has paralyzed a lot of families, which cannot afford them. The loan provided by government has not only enabled the majority to afford a houses but has also made the businesses to flourish. For instance the small construction companies were about to be crashed something around 10 years ago and interfere of government made it possible for a lot of them to avoid bankruptcy.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead to the conclusion that there are lots of main issues that cannot be solved without the positive interfere of governments.
- TPO-53 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is much easier for people to achieve success without their family members’ help now than in the past? 80
- It is better to take a secure job with a low pay than to take a job with a high pay but is easy to lose 3
- 5 Aug: Many companies provide important products or services, but also damage the environment. Some people believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them to pay a penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is much easier for people to achieve success without their family members’ help now than in the past? 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...y different perspective and assert that the interfere of government is essential in order to ...
Line 2, column 509, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...ery. Expenses were tremendous and if it wasnt for the government I could have easily ...
Line 2, column 554, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
... for the government I could have easily be dead in less than 3 days, as doctors cl...
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: A_PLURAL
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a house' or simply 'houses'?
Suggestion: a house; houses
...not only enabled the majority to afford a houses but has also made the businesses to flo...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in short, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79230769231 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71879643287 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4615486576 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3684210526 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5263157895 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110062054156 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297193269802 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479844924325 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0676068945012 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511045743754 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.