People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment. Which one of the following three actions is most useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community? Explain why? Increase access to public transportation (for example, buses or trains) to reduce the number of automobiles on local roads Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As an inseparable part of glorious societies, protecting the environment is one the primitive concerns of human beings. However, the question of what is the most efficacious approach to improve the natural environment, has aroused as the subject of controversy among the authorities. When it comes to my position, I personally subscribe to the view that increasing access to public transportation is he most significant pillar of protecting the environment. I have some reasons, two of which will be aptly explicated hereunder.
The first reason worth discussing here is that increasing the public transportation positively affect the world hydrological condition. As a matter of fact, maintaining the status quo of public transportation is not a favorable decision for citizens, since they should spend a lot of time and energy to reach these facilities. In this way, they usually prefer to use their own cars. By so doing, the government is put under a lot of pressure to expand the road network. Developing road itself stimulates more people to use their private cars. If this trend follows, in the near future the surrounding environment will be completely destroyed. In other words, the more road ministry builds new roads, the more trees will be cut down. Trees are the most considerable blessing of every area. Not only do trees produce a large amount of oxygen, but also they regulate hydrological process in the environment. To be more specific, trees need carbon dioxide for their photosynthesis process, which significantly reduces the amount of this greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. As greenhouse gases prevent the cloud making process, eliminating them leads to much more clouds and regular precipitation as well as the more underground water reservoir in the following. Hence, expanding public transportation facilities has a key role in controlling the water cycle.
By the same token, another equally paramount point to be mentioned is that developing public transportation prevent animal extinction. Expanding public transportation dramatically decrease people's dependency on using their private cars which leads to less deforestation necessity. In fact, green areas are the main habitat of animals and plants. Manipulating the ecosystem brings about a variegated stream of unpredictable challenges. More precisely, all of the animals are in the relation of a predator, prey, consumer, producer at the same time. Therefore, disturbing the eco-environment situation causes food chain disruption. Furthermore, cars by burning fossil fuel release a huge amount of toxic greenhouses into the air which can adversely affect the climate pattern in the long run by global warming and increasing inter-glacial periods. These natural disruptions cause animal extinction, such as what has happened to dinosaurs million years ago. What's more, emitting poisonous gases provide a dangerous situation for free birds in nature which really threaten their lives. Consequently, extending public transportation has a direct impact on animals' life condition.
By and large, according to the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly agree with this standpoint that developing the public transportation has a great contribution to the preservation of the environment. I strongly recommended that government allocate extra fund budget for developing public transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1144, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... making process, eliminating them leads to much more clouds and regular precipitat...
^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...predictable challenges. More precisely, all of the animals are in the relation of a predat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 936, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... such as what has happened to dinosaurs million years ago. Whats more, emitting poisono...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 955, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...appened to dinosaurs million years ago. Whats more, emitting poisonous gases provide ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1151, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...c transportation has a direct impact on animals life condition. By and large, accordin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, really, so, therefore, well, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, by and large, in other words, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 8.0752688172 396% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2856.0 1977.66487455 144% => OK
No of words: 511.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58904109589 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28987555401 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 295.0 212.727598566 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577299412916 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 887.4 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6498137437 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18812694251 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440933609702 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416841523488 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107516959077 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514503293745 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 10.9000537634 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 86.8835125448 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.