People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment. Which one of the following three actions is most useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community? Explain why? Increase access

It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and radically progressive era in which we live, all human being have always been involved in a great struggle to shield and enhance their natural environment in order to have a better life. Whereas some people debate that creating parks or encouraging individuals to cease providing plastic bags is a great idea for helping the environment, on the other side of the continuum, stand others, believing that development of the people’s access to public transportations is better than the other mentioned choices. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with the second mental attitude. In the ensuing essay, my standpoint will be perspicuously substantiated by the underlying and conspicuous reasons.

To begin with, one of the most exquisite points of increasing access to public transportations such as subways, buses, and trains is that it can dramatically decrease air pollution. This concept is a dominant and paramount factor in the majority of the big cities and moreover, if the mayor of a city solves this problem accurately and correctly, he is able to provide a better life for people of that city and also creates a great environment for animals who live there. An example can shed some light on this subject clearly. Several years ago, the mayor of Tehran set several rules and regulations for people in order to reduce the number of cars on the streets. Besides this issue, he increased the access of people to subways. These two issues were dramatically appreciated by people of that city because they created a beautiful natural environment for people and also animals by declining air pollution there. Subways also saved much more time for people of that region and the result of a local poll showed that the preponderance of people is really satisfied.

Furthermore, another equally paramount point regarding enhancing the access of people to public transportations to be mentioned is that it really decreases the level of stress in people and they are not always anxious. To make it clear, this issue actually prevents people from carrying out several adverse habits such as horning when they are in heavy traffic. Under such a circumstance, a better environment without annoying sound will be formed for adult people when they want to travel or do exercise. An example can drive this notion dramatically home. In the aforementioned example, the result of that poll also indicated that the rate of using horn during driving was obviously increased and almost all adult people were extremely happy about this occurrence. In such a situation, the mayor also helped adults to have a calm environment.

In conclusion, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of the opinion that the increase in individuals’ access to public transportations is the greatest idea compared to other mentioned topics. This is because it creates an opportunity for a city to decrease the level of air pollution in the city and also provides a better environment without annoying sound for adults.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d adults to have a calm environment. In conclusion, taking into account the afo...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, furthermore, if, may, moreover, really, regarding, second, so, whereas, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2588.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 504.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13492063492 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00785274415 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.9341090661 48.9658058833 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.210526316 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5263157895 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26384327717 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814301048784 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491273993711 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154822213043 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629215532881 0.0645574589148 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.