People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment. Which one of the following three actions is most useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community? Explain why?
۱٫ Plant trees and create parks
۲٫ Persuade local shops to stop providing plastic bags to customers
۳٫ Increase access to public transportation (for example, buses or trains) to reduce the number of automobiles on local roads
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is obvious that in today's fast-paced world, although people have access to more facilities and advanced equipment which have helped them to live easier life, they have also faced many problems resulted from the development of technology including environmental problems. In this way, it is people's duty to contribute to solve these problems. In other words they play a crucial role in improving the environment conditions. I believe that planting trees and create parks would be more useful for people to do in order to help the environment. In the following paragraphs, iwill discuss my view using some reasons and examples.
To begin with, I think one of the most important actions which people can carry out to improve the environment is to try to plants trees. In fact, nowadays, people are suffering from environmental pollutions that are the result of the growth of industries and greenhouse gas emission like co2. The air pollution has caused serious damage to individual's health and they suffer from different diseases such as respiratory problems, heart disorders, and so on. Therefore, planting trees will absorb co2 and will release oxygen which is useful for people's health. For instance, I live in a large city in which there are a lot of big industries. People have already suffered from air pollution; but, people decide to improve these conditions by planting trees in different places. Thus, it would help to decrease air pollution and people are able to enjoy breathing in clean weather.
Secondly, I believe that planting trees not only will assist to air pollution to be reduced and to clean the environment but also provides a green and beautiful environment for people to live. As a matter of fact, it will lead them to be bodily and mentally healthier. It will give them a good opportunity to spend their free time going to park and do their favorite activities. For example, my friend lives in a city in which there are few parks. Hence, he needs to go a long distance to reach the park to get exercise. Also, I prefer to choose a neighborhood to live which I have access to park to take my children to park to play.
To sum up, according to the points and examples mentioned above, it is better for people to plant trees to help improve the environment. This action not only help clean the environment and will decrease air pollution but also will cause people to have a green space to live.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'plant'.
Suggestion: plant
...to improve the environment is to try to plants trees. In fact, nowadays, people are su...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e people to have a green space to live.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82014388489 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68474411917 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508393285372 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8224077653 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324207574779 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102463928161 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777384484778 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213488170799 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589259200541 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.